Talk:Clearwater, Florida

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Clearwater, Florida article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects Click on [show] for further details
This article is part of WikiProject Florida, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the State of Florida on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
This article is supported by WikiProject Cities, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Cities on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Clearwater, Florida is part of the WikiProject Saints, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Saints on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to saints as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to saints. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents 1 Notes 2 Needs citing: 3 Bias of local government? 4 tech data 5 putting clearwater on the map 6 Xenu.net is an adequate source. 7 Saints?

[edit] Notes

A couple of notes on this page:

• The Scientology section is historically accurate, and was a major part of the history of the city throughout the last three decades. I believe it is NPOV. For the record, I am not the author of that section.

• To Moreau36, thanks for the clarification regarding the Mexican/Mexican-American population.

-PlainSight 17:19, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Needs citing:

From the trivia item on the Mary image: "(This was not the first act of vandalism on the image: Previously, someone had thrown acid on the windows, but the image re-appeared.)" Really? This begs a source. Bobak 19:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I think I saw that in the SPTimes.User:Mikereichold | User_talk:Mikereichold 22:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

SPTime may have had the story. I recall it was tomatoes, not acid, and that the image was not affected. Osprey 22:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bias of local government?

• I would like to see details of the influence of Scientology on the local goverment and services of Clearwater. Some of the civil workforce seem to be biased in favour of the "church" and I find this extremly perturbing to say the least. I believe that democratic values are compromised here.

I have added a piece to it, as I am disgusted by these cultists.

Please remember that whatever you add should be from verifiable, reliable sources. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

To re-iterate and clarify my last sentence: whatever you add needs to be from verifiable, reliable sources, or else it will do little to no good. If you say "Well, I should be able to say that the local government is biased in favor of Scientology, because I live there and I see it happening," then what do you think will be added by the next Scientologist who sees what you added? That Scientologist will insert into the article "the Church of Scientology is cherished and beloved by all of Clearwater for all the good it does, except by a small contingent of hatemongers who are in the pay of a psychiatric conspiracy." Would you be happy that they added that? I suspect not. But they are only doing what you would like to do -- add their own personal opinion to the article, based on nothing more than "I personally believe this to be so."

Now if, say, you find a newspaper article that talks about indications of a bias towards the Church, that newspaper article will probably count as a verifiable, reliable source. You can then cite that source in the article. But if you can't cite such sources, then by Wikipedia policy, any editor can remove your uncited claims. And that is probably better than what could happen, which is that you'd encourage the very "cultists" you refer to to insert their own uncited opinions. -- Antaeus Feldspar 14:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] tech data

Despite the Post Office address, Tech Data's HQ is actually within the corporate boundaries of the City of Largo. Cheers, :) MikeReichold 14:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] putting clearwater on the map

Clearwater was a tourist destination long before Scientology showed up. Like the rest of Pinellas County, the biggest factor in the area's growth was the return of WWII vets as torists and residents after the war. You see an agricutural economy based on citrus in the first half of the 20th century. The area suffered during the Depression. The military used the area for trainig during the war. After the war, electronics, the freeze of 1962, and the influx of people as tourists and residents displaced agriculture. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mikereichold (talk • contribs) 15:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC).

As a florida resident I can say this is absolutely true. Scientology doesn't increase the tourism to clearwater nor does it 'put it on the map'. I removed that bit and replaced it with sourced material I had on before which someone removed.Wikidudeman 17:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Xenu.net is an adequate source.

Wikipedias policy on neutrality does not extend to citations or references. All sources and all editors have bias including newspapers and news publications. Citing a source that has a specific opinion of a subject is not against wikipedia policy. If it were then citing "talk origins" in the evolution article would be against policy. It isn't. Citing Xenu.net is allowed per WP:NPOV. It may not be a neutral source but it provides a reliable reference for the existence of Scientology in Clearwater Florida and the purported bias of the police force.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 23:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Up to a point, Lord Copper. You might want to have a look at Wikipedia:Reliable sources, which states that personal websites "should not be used as sources of information about a person or topic other than the owner of the website, or author of the book." The statement "The Clearwater Police Force has been dubbed the "Scientology police force"" is unsatisfactory, because it doesn't say who's done the dubbing. I've changed this to read "Critics of Scientology have dubbed the Clearwater Police Force the "Scientology police force"", as that does clearly attribute the viewpoint. -- ChrisO 00:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Xenu.net is not a 'personal website' in any sense of the word. It's a website publised to criticism of Scientology. Moreover that website is being used as a source for the statement that the Clearwater police force has been dubbed the "Scientology police force" as well as assertions of bias from the police force which the site details very clearly.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 03:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I've moved the section in question to here:

"There have been numerous accusations of bias by the police force in favor of Scientology. Critics of Scientology have dubbed the Clearwater Police Force the "Scientology police force". <ref>http://www.xenutv.com/trust/policevideo.htm</ref>

Evidence that xenutv is a personal web site is in the only complete sentence on the page, which says, "This documentary was produced to demonstrate what I believed to be a clear bias against the LMT by members of the Clearwater Police Force who were on Scientology's payroll." This is one person's views. It does not meet the criteria of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. -- Donald Albury 00:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I thought we were talking about xenu.net (at least, Wikidudeman was). xenutv.com appears to be an entirely different website. Xenu.net does have a pretty decent reputation as representative of Scientology critics, as it's a compilation of material from a lot of different sources (it even has its own Wikipedia article) but xenutv.com seems to be much more of a one-man band. I agree with your assessment. -- ChrisO 00:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Saints?

Just how does this article fall under the Saints project? -- Donald Albury 22:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)