Talk:Claus process
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PLEASE use the above + tab to enter a new comment. That provides you a form in which to first enter a Subject and then enter the new comment. Please sign the comment with four tildes like this ~~~~. That automatically signs it with your user name, the date and the time. The form automatically provides subject headings like those below and enters them in the table of contents which will appear below after four comments are posted.
The first responder to someone's new comment should enter the response just beneath the new comment (instead of using the above + tab) and indent the response by starting with a colon like this :. Any second responder, indent further by starting with two colons like this :: and any third responder, start with three colons like this ::: and so forth. If we don't follow these practices, the result is jumbled mess.
The first responder to someone's new comment should enter the response just beneath the new comment (instead of using the above + tab) and indent the response by starting with a colon like this :. Any second responder, indent further by starting with two colons like this :: and any third responder, start with three colons like this ::: and so forth. If we don't follow these practices, the result is jumbled mess.
[edit] Reasons for reverting edit by User:Otispa about Morpholine
I believe the edit about Morpholine was well intentioned. I reverted it because:
- It was completely out of context. This is an article about the Claus process ... it is not about problems with the DGA process.
- It was very poorly formatted by someone who seems not to have taken the time to learn how to write as per the Wikipedia manual of style.
- The subject matter would be better written as a separate article on the DGA process. At best it only deserves a sentence or two in this article.
- The edit refers to a "Case History" ... but includes no reference as to who wrote that case history or where it was obtained.
If User:Otispa would create a personal sandbox and write a brief article (in that sandbox) about the DGA process and its problems, I would be happy to help him format it in Wikipedia style. I would also be happy to boil it down into one or two sentences for inclusion in this article. But first, I would need to have a reference to back up the "Case History." - mbeychok 00:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
