Talk:Clásico Regiomontano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on Clásico Regiomontano is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of football (soccer) related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
Archive on "Resolved NPOV Discussion regarding Tigres favoritism in "Notable Clásicos" Section" |
[edit] Peerreview Suggestions
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.[?]
- This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
- See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
- There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 16 Cl, use 16 Cl, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 16 Cl.[?] - Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
- As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Hari Seldon 12:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dates of the 81 matches
Only a few of the Clásico Regiomontano matches have dates given. Can anyone provide dates of the other matches in the Historical Results section? Kevyn 18:55, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Re: One of the main problems is that there is little documentation for the 81 Clásicos. I, for instance, started watching the Clásicos 10 years ago, and that means that I am only familiar and remeber Clásicos from the 46th to the 81st. But getting cited information is very hard! Most of my contributions are done by memory. I am, however, researching and looking for documentation for this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.248.36.100 (talk • contribs) 08:58, 18 April 2006.
- I've added the dates and places for the first 10 Clásicos. I got them from the homepage of a recognized soccer commentor from Monterrey ( the webpage is Chavana.com) If someone wishes to continue addind the dates, please do. Dreyesbo 15:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- EXCELLENT! I've put the sources for those 10 games in proper Wikipedia citation format. Anyone want to volunteer to do the remaining 72? Kevyn 19:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Criteria for Notable Clásicos
This comment is to propose a Criteria for adding content to the "Notable Clásicos" section.
It is common that whenever a Clásico ends, someone wants to add the result and a chronicle of the game to the "Notable Clásicos" Section. Though it may feel great at the moment that your team won or your favorite player scored, it should be taken into account that this is an encyclopedia, not a blog. Only truly Notable games should be added to the section, and not just any league or friendly match that happens to be most recent.
Currently, there is a Historical Results sub-section in the Record Section. Unless the Clásico has been truly notable, the correct procedure should be to simply add the result, date, and stadium to the list/table.
But what is a truly notable Clásico? I would like to propose the following criteria:
- The First Clásico in which something happened (i.e., the First Clásico ever played, the first Clásico with more than 3 goals, the first Clásico played in a certain competition, or in a certain stadium, or in a certain unusual condition --like, the first Clásico played outside Monterrey, or outside of Mexico, or, if they ever play in Europe or Asia, outside the American continent, or the first time in Copa Libertadores, or something really remarkable--)
- A Clásico with a broad goal differential, i.e., where a team wins by goal difference of 3 or more.
- A Clásico with a remarkable amount of goals scored (i.e., if they ever tie 7-7, it would be remarkable, but I think that if there is more than 6 goals scored in the game, the game is notable).
- A Clásico with importance beyond city pride, such as, a Clásico in the playoffs (semi-finals, Old-style "Liguilla", finals, etc...), or a Clásico that decides whether or not one team goes to an inferior division.
Currently, all Clásicos listed in the "Notable Clásicos" section meet the above criteria. I propose this criteria, and would ask for suggestions on how to improve it. In any case, it is clear that, though every Clásico is memorable, not all are "Notable".
Hari Seldon 12:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
