User talk:Cjosefy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Updates to Baylor University article

I have been working on a number of articles and items related to Baylor University including the main Baylor University article. Also, I am still learning proper etiquette and culture here on wiki. Several days ago I edited in two places in the article the total number of staff, faculty, and students. I think you changed those numbers back to what they had been previously. I would like for us to arrive at the best way to get these numbers updated.

804 is the faculty number cited in several university reference documents, but those documents make clear that this number is for AAUP defined faculty and does not include library faculty. I included a reference to the 2006 Fall Facts [1] which shows that there are 31 additional faculty members from the library bringing the total faculty count to 835. The later referenced document in the article under reports total faculty and that is explained in the document. The same report that I cite above provides a ocunt of total staff at the university.

The student enrollment data that is now reported in the article is from the Fall 2006 enrollment information. New reports showing Spring 2007 enrollment figures have been released. I may well have cited the wrong report and numbers in my update. That doesn't really matter to me now. I just want to get the right info out there. This is the Spring 2007 enrollment report [2]. Is it most common to report total headcount on enrollment or total FTE?

I believe that it would be more accurate to reflect the numbers from the reports that I mention above within the article. I am looking for guidance and a way for us to avoid bouncing back and forth between the new and old numbers. Please excuse any malaprops that I may have made in this communication. As I said above, I am new to the environment and culture and appreciate any guidance. Thanks --RKWoodruff 02:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Insistance Upon Use of Gender Biased Terminology

Your re-edit of the International Space Station article, so that it once again uses the gender-biased term "manned" instead of a gender neutral phrase like "with a human crew", has the potential to divide the Wikipedia community. Is that your intent? Sdsds 23:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Denver Discography

Hey, thanks for the help with uploading the album covers! Editor19841 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] STS-115

Thanks for pointing out my (rather large) mistake. :) Palebluedots 20:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Saturn V infobox

Template:Saturn V infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | Chess | E-mail 20:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Excuse me?

Where do you get off threatening me for my edits. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.126.143.59 (talkcontribs) 13:43, August 25, 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Smashing Pumpkins

I would just like to say nice job on the SP page. Thanks alot for uploading those promo photos too, thats awesome. I think now we have enough images to completely rid of the album covers, especially since I completed the Post break-up project I had. -- Reaper X 03:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, thats awesome. Could you please upload the photo from Machina/Machines of God (promo) too? -- Janadore 19:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] cleanup tag

Please do not take the cleanup tag personally. An editor believes that the article needs cleanup and has tagged it as such, with agreement from at least one other editor. Discussion has now occurred on the talk page regarding the matter, and deletion of the tag without significant editing or community consensus may be construed as vandalism (or trigger a 3RR violation or edit war over a tag). It's not a reflection on you or your work - we just want to make the article better. Why not help by editing the article instead of the tag? :) Girolamo Savonarola 20:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I see where you were coming from, but the whole point of assume good faith is to "assume" it. As per the policy: Assume that others are trying to help Wikipedia rather than harm it, unless there is clear and present evidence to the contrary. Even if misguided or improperly done, the legitimacy of the tag is in the fact that an editor has in good faith tried to add the tag to bring attention the article so as to improve it. Not to point it out as flawed (except in order that it may be fixed). Girolamo Savonarola 20:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Space Shuttle Atlantis

Hi, thanks for undoing Rebecca's revert of my date edit at Space Shuttle Atlantis. You may be aware of this, but she has promised several different editors that she will revert each such edits. If you look at her contributions, you will see that she has used the admin rollback tool to do exactly that.

Several editors are also complaining to her about incivility. See her talk page, and comments she has made elsewhere. Regards. bobblewik 18:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Zwan promo 2003.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zwan promo 2003.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok 01:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tucson Toros memorabilia

Hi, and thanks for stopping by my Talk page. I'm not aware of our having any Eusebio equipment, although there may be a cracked bat in there with his name on it. We bought a helmet and a few other things at the time of the name change, but I don't have rosters from 1993 and earlier for looking up numbers, so in some cases we never know whose stuff it was. I did have an Orlando Miller Javalinas jacket, but to my lasting distress I lost it somewhere about five years ago. A least one of the Jerseys is Chris Hatcher, but I don't really remember, if I ever knew, who else is represented. We started going to Toros games around July 1993, so we didn't have all that much chance to see Eusebio before he was promoted to Houston. Regards. Karen | Talk | contribs 19:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bill Murray

Hi, can you upload the pics to commons, so that i can put it in ther others wikipedias?--Domingo Portales 20:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: Mayonaise -> Mayonnaise

The Smashing Pumpkins song is intentionally spelled as "Mayonaise" as opposed to Mayonnaise. I noticed this was changed on The Smashing Pumpkins discography. I'm not sure it it was changed on any other pages. Cjosefy 14:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for that. I've added that article to my exception list. Cheers, CmdrObot 15:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)