Talk:Citabria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aviation, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to aviation. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.	Aviation Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related WikiProjects and/or task forces: Aircraft WikiProject

---

For whatever it's worth (before anyone asks), titling this article simply Citabria makes sense. The aircraft article naming guidelines don't quite address the complicated situation that applies here. The Citabria (in all its varieties) is a significant enough variant to deserve a separate article from Aeronca Champ. This article could be called Champion Citabria, on the rationale that Champion was the designer and original manufacturer, but this isn't the name generally thought of first today. This article could be called Bellanca Citabria, on the rationale that Bellanca produced—according to some sources—the largest combined count of these designs. This article could be called American Champion Citabria, on the rationale that this is the current owner and producer of the design. The choice of the name Citabria seems to settle these competing claims in accordance with the suggestion of the general naming conventions to "use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things." SkipperPilot 20:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps in the opening description the(incorrect?)alternate spelling of "Citaborea" should be included; as well as perhaps the reasoning behind the error. This seems to be a common mistake when referencing this aircraft and its variants. 199.46.245.233 20:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Never seen that before. Reference required. Paul Beardsell 04:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)