Talk:Cindy Chavez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

The edits made to this page eliminate some of the obviously biased description of the recent Mayor's race, information clearly intended to portray Ms. Chavez in a negative light.

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus; default to keep.

Chavez supporters have been vandalizing this page, removing factual information that is relevant, and replacing it with enthusiastic propaganda. Continued vigilance needed.

[edit] Recent Revisions

Hey folks, lets keep this article neutral. Wikipedia is not a place to sway voters one way or the other. The recent edits to this page leading to the upcoming election on Nov. 7th are utterly irresponsible and rediculous. - Illumynite 07:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I've tried to revert some of the muck here...again, but I probably missed some of it. I also found a similarly ridiculous statement on Chuck Reed's article tying him to Congressman Mark Foley's sex abuse scandal (uncited at that). I've tried to fix that as well. Frankly, both sides need to stop using Wiki as a platform for their electoral campaigns.

Yes I have noticed the muck on Chuck Reed's page as well. It's petty and childish, just as the muck on this article is petty and childish. It's rediculous, but I will keep removing it as I find it, I believe in Wikipedia and can't stand these anonymous poser's making up lies about their favored candidates opponents. Illumynite 08:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)