From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. |
Resources and guidelines for editing Mesoamerica-related articles:
Guidelines— Outline of suggested guidelines and editing conventions
References— Selected resources and compendia of Mesoamerican sources and studies
Citations— Bibliography and pre-filled citations for Mesoamerican sources
Worklists— Project worklists and activities
|
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload. |
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
Low |
This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
|
This article is also supported by the WikiProject Aztec sub-project. |
WikiProject Mesoamerica priority open tasks: (click "show" to expand)
|
[edit] Proposed merge
- Cihuacóatl is the same term as Cihuacoatl. My understanding is that the English Wikipedia typically does not use the Spanish-accented versions for Nahuatl. --Dystopos 15:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
The merge in fact already exists, and the statement that the cihuacoatl functionary was a woman is nonsensical and should be removed. Retal 00:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- The merge did not "already exist" -- the PROPOSAL to merge existed, which is not the same thing. I performed the merge. Please, if the content in the current article is wrong, remove it and cite sources with footnotes. Thanks. -- phoebe (brassratgirl) /(talk) 22:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References
Despite the fact that references are listed on this page (merged in from Cihuacóatl) I'm leaving the unreferenced tag, as statements need to be cited down to the page with footnotes due to the controversy above. Any other references, further reading etc that could be added is welcome. -- phoebe (brassratgirl) /(talk) 22:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)