Talk:Cigarillo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Three times over, and I still don't get the stub category. Those pharmacology stubs don't look like anything that the cigarillo, which is a type of cigar, would blend in. In lieu of not wanting an edit war, couldn't we just mark it as a stub? --Pedro G. S. Almeida 11:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
The grammar on this page was horrible and it was full of useless information about Black and Mild cigarillos. I attempted to clean it up as much as possible. 68.35.201.102 04:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
"Cigarillos are a more socially acceptable, economical, and sexually alluring alternative." Really, this looks like it was written by a cigarillo marketing department.
"Cigarillo is also the Spanish word for "Cigarette." Isn't the Spanish word "cigaro," making this a needless comment? I am going to remove this comment. --GlassSandwich 07:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Id like to know what happened to the article on Cafe Creme which was linked form this page, I created it and it was deleted a few days later after others had made minor edits but I cant trace who did it. It would be nice before removal that a dsicussion is held rather than someone coming along and taking it off. If there is a good reason and acn tell me fine, but if not its not right. Any Comments? --PrincessBrat 20:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- This is merely a heads-up for other readers of this page, as PrincessBrat knows what follows. As can be seen on the discussion board for the cigar article, the Café Crème article was considered biased, or too reminiscent of appraisal for the brand. I don't think there would be a problem with anyone making it again, but remain objective, stick to the facts, and gather enough info to produce more than a stub.
 |
