From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Cars Portal This article is supported by Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of Automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

Contents 1 Merge 2 Images 3 Town & Controversial

[edit] Merge

There is no purpose of this article as it stands. In my opinion, "Chrysler Town and Country" should be a disambiguation page discussing the various vehicles using this name (not just the modern minivan), and all minivan content should be merged with Dodge Caravan. There are not sufficient differences between these vehicles to justify all this duplicate text. --SFoskett 14:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

No, not all Chrysler Group minivans should be merged with the Dodge Caravan article. Previously there was a "Chrysler minivans" article, and the content was later split up (after a discussion, I believe) into the separate articles. Leave them alone and let the articles develop. Think about the international differences also. - Slo-mo 03:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Slo-mo, they are separate cars, yes they are similar in many ways but they are different in many ways. - Bavaria 19:35, 11 Febuary 2006 (UTC)

There is really no need for a merger. If you remember there was a merged article before but it got so long it was hardly legible. If you haven't noticed yet the articles are beginning to go their separate ways and if you merge them now all progress will be lost. 24.63.10.62 19:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC) Note:This comment was also made by User:Bavaria

Leave the Voyager, Town and Country, and Caravan separate! Note:This comment was also made by User:Bavaria

• As mentioned above, these articles were recently re-split after a discussion. Merging them would just create a bigger problem. Admittedly, these articles are for the time being very similar, however that is only because not enough time has been allowed to let them develop. When I split them, I didn't add any brand-specific info, but only made minor changes to have the articles make sense. Just give it some time. Please see Talk:Chrysler minivans for the previous discussion. Airline 00:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

leave them apart!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Newestguy1 (talk • contribs) .

i just wanted to note that not only would it be long, it would just look like you stacked the the articles on top of each other, making the merger rerundant. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.30.180.180 (talk • contribs) .

I think the merge is not a good idea. If the vehicles were somehow related in any way other than name and the fact that some of them were woodys, then it would make sense. In this case it doesn't. Bcirker 15:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

See, I suggested the merger because "pre-1990" sounds a bit awkward. The name was used much longer before it became a minivan. --Jnelson09 16:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Images

It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

The Second and Third Generation Images could be improved. The Second gen. is a rear image that is not of great quality, and the third gen. is a Dodge Caravan not a Town and Country. I agree with 24.63.10.62 that there should be better images. Bavaria 12:25, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Town & Controversial

Uhh, if the name was used on several Mopars, why aren't they on this page?

Also, I changed "Town & Countries" to "Town & Countrys", because it's a name, so "-ys" is correct. (See Talk:Lend-Lease Sherman tanks for debate on why not...) Trekphiler 04:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)