Talk:Chrysler Sebring (coupe)

[edit] Requested move

Chrysler Sebring (coupe) → Chrysler Sebring – same car just different body style Ejfetters 04:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Procedural Oppose - this is not a requested move, this is a MERGE request. 70.51.9.174 09:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Add any additional comments

Support No need to have sepearate pages for all a car's different body styles. This is confusing, it would make more sense to add them all into one article and seperate entries for the different styles like in most other car pages. Ejfetters 04:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong Oppose The Chrysler Sebring article was a giant mess flooded with infoboxes until I split them up and amde the article managible. Karrmann 12:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Oppose The article split the way it is now is clearer. The Sebring is an unusual case in that the body styles are not mechanically similar (the sedan is identical to the Dodge Stratus, the convertible is based on but not identical to the Stratus and has different styling (especially in thie first generation) and the coupe is a Mitsubishi Eclipse). Trying to cram all this information plus images of the different versions into one article made a muddled mess. IFCAR 00:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Oppose per IFCAR. --Interiot 12:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Oppose per IFCAR. The previously consolidated single article can be seen here, and it was indeed a mess; the split improved things. As a caveat, however, casual readers shouldn't have to figure out what body style they're interested in; they should be able to reader a generic Sebring article. So I reckon the Chrysler Sebring page needs more work. --DeLarge 07:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment Yes, all of these articles need serious attention. Karrmann 10:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)