Talk:Christian theology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Merge Controversy
I think that the controversy page should just be merged as a section here. Might help resolve the NPOV issues there, as well. PhatJew 10:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Schools of thought
I added a section on schools of thought in Christian theology...made it alphabetic for NPOV purposes, but thought that perhaps it could be / should be divided into larger sections...i.e., Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, with appropriate links in those sub-sections. Thoughts? KHM03 20:52, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] references?
Isn't the reference section supposed to be for information sources used to create the article? I wouldn't think it would take all of those sources to create a link page, which is what this article is at the moment. Liblamb 04:49, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Something which may interest editors of this page
Any help which could be provided would be greatly appreciated. Agriculture 07:37, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Covenantalism
I removed this from the list of "schools of theology" because it is primarily a Calvinist subgenre. I may be wrong; if so, let's talk about it. KHM03 12:37, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- I think that Covenant Theology should be included. First, while it is primarily advocated among Calvinists, it is not necessarily so; and such can also be said of New Covenant Theology. And Dispensationalism is likewise attached to baptistic fundamentalists, though not exclusively (e.g. Reformed Baptists are baptistic fundamentalists-of-a-sort that are some of the strongest advocates of Covenant Theology, among some, and New Covenant Theology, among others). Three weeks ago I added it back. The lack of interest says something. :-/ Cool. No prob. GUÐSÞEGN – UTEX – 21:31, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Didache
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Didache#Didache_Title_Translation_Question
Anyone interested in looking into this one. Simonapro 18:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)]
[edit] Suggestion
"Present Day COntroversies" seems laden with POV. In particular, the focus on Pentacostalism and the charismata seems too in-depth for this article, and should be a seperate article or included in a different article. There are plenty of other contemporary debates in modern theology. Pastordavid 19:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)