Talk:Chloe Vevrier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chloe Vevrier article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is part of WikiProject Porn stars, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to porn stars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's fair use policy almost never permits the use of "fair use" images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

Contents 1 DOB 2 Breasts 3 Natural look 4 External links 5 Vevrier 6 NO PICTURE

[edit] DOB

I see alternate DOB as 1971 (most likely) and 1972 (least likely). Absent solid proof - I am not going to change the current version (1968)

[edit] Breasts

I don't believe, her breasts are natural. How can they grow from a F cup to a J cup by themselves?

If you read a lot about her, then you would probably know that they're natural. Plus, they don't even look fake at all. --Snkcube 06:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

To grow from an F cup to nearly a J cup (four cup sizes) over time, as Chloe's breasts have done, is quite possible. In some women, this happens due to ingesting of birth control pills, others by putting on weight (and retaining the excess in the bosom), and still others, through pregnancy. The moral of the story: just because a woman has developed a large bosom, it doesn't mean that she achieved it through plastic surgery. -- Jalabi99 06:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Natural look

Maybe it would be a good idea to mention, that in most of her movies and photo sessions she has hairy armpits and pubic area. This is a part of her natural look and it's unusual for an adult model, therefore it makes sense to mention it here. I'm not going to change the article because I've seen just a few pictures of her and no movie. This schoud make somebody, who knows more about it, and with a better Englisch than me. --maartinxxxx72 25 May 2006

[edit] External links

Why not be a little redundant and (also) list them in an "external links" section? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vevrier

While there is a certain (small) possibility of User:vevrier being Chloe Vevrier herself, I do not believe so, and proof would be difficult anyway. If you are, my apologies, no offense intended, but unless there's libel on here, you really should NOT be editing your own article at all - see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 1.3 and 1.4. especially as most of your edits could be seen as pushing your own commercial interests.

Continuing on, I do not believe the above person is Vevrier, and it would be oh, so easy to get myself an account like User:ChloeVevrier or any such permutation myself and claim the same. Therefore, the edits have to be taken on their own, and they are mainly deletions (including a page blanking!). Therefore I will likely continue to revert them. MadMaxDog

Update: The above person is NOT Chloe Vevrier (see edit warring / edit summaries around the 14th February 2007) - after first claiming to be her ("My name and age removed...") he later notes that his edits are "merely updates of her career". No real person involved in an edit war over her own biography entry would suddenly start referring to herself in the third person. Point made. MadMaxDog 05:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree with your assessment here. Good catch. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 06:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NO PICTURE

Why is there no picture of chloe? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.101.213.232 (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC).

Because there are no public domain pictures of her known. Any would be appreciated. MadMaxDog 03:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)