Talk:Chicken Soup with Barley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Chicken Soup with Barley
[edit] Talk Page
The neutrality of this article is being disputed? By whom? This article is a shinig beacon of neutralness amidst the dark night of biasness, an oasis of fair thinking in the dusty desert full of the sands of one-sidedness, the golden egg of impartiality in the chicken farm of bigotry, the shiny 2p coin of justness in the dark dirty wallet of prejudice.
I don't think it is biased.
[edit] Links
- Thesaurus.com Stuck for words that mean biased? Try here.
[edit] HACK
This is a delibrate rip off of my work, especially the following:
Sarah; who is an adamant Socialist, is strong, family-minded, honest though bossy; Harry; who is Sarah’s husband, is weak, a liar, not at all manly and lacks conviction, Sarah’s antithesis if you will; Ada; is extremely passionate about what she believes in, Marxism, like the others, is also romantic both personally and politically; and finally Ronnie; youthful idealistic and just as romantic as Ada.
Who've commited this grave act of plagarism, has got to be the biggest, most unoriginal Bormannite ever. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pazuzu1990 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 21 February 2006.
- You posted that yourself. By doing so, you have licensed it under the GFDL. Did you read the notice on the edit page, saying "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."? So stop complaining. You're most welcome to make serious contributions to this encyclopedia and help improving this article. You do seem to know quite a bit about Wesker and this play in particular, so it'd be great if you could improve it. But please remember that this is not your personal soapbox: the general tone of the stuff you had written earlier was way too dadaist, and moreover completely unsourced. You need to proviode sources. You might want to read WP:NPOV, WP:CITE, and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Lupo 07:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
