Talk:Chen Yun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
More information about this article... High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Chen Yun Addendum

I am not an expert on Chinese history, but according to China scholar Roderick MacFarquhar, whose course I am taking at Harvard, if Chen Yun "saw political danger, he disappeared." He was not, as the stub claims, a key player throughout modern Chinese history. He was key as the Minister of Economics until the Great Leap Forward, at which time he along with Zhou Enlai suggested slower economic reform. He and Zhou were forced to self-criticize for such a suggestion. Thereafter, as Chinese politics became increasingly leftist going into the Cultural Revolution, he became increasingly scarce. He had very little to no bearing on the course of the Cultural Revolution, so perhaps it is a bit much for the article to claim that he was a key player in the span of modern Chinese history "almost to its entirety."