Talk:Chemiluminescence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, which collaborates on Chemistry and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.. |
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. | |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
This article needs to be edited to Chemiluminscence, instead of Chemoluminscence. The root word is Chemi- not Chemo- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.245.231.58 (talk • contribs) .
- Agree. The IUPAC Gold Book lists only chemiluminescence (http://goldbook.iupac.org/C01045.html), as does Mirriam-Webster's. Brendio 09:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Surely, "enhanced Chemiluminescence" is a merely a technique, it is not a type of chemiluminescence and should not be described on the same level the actual phenomena described here. Moreover, ECL is an acronym more commonly used for electrochemiluminescence or electrogenerated chemiluminescence.--Cfhogan 08:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
