Talk:Cheadle Hulme High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cheadle Hulme High School article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-Importance within Schools.
Current Collaborations: McGill-Toolen Catholic High School - Newton North High School - Kennet Comprehensive School

Victuallers 19:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on September 2, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

These quotes are straight from Wikipedia:Verifiability, which is an official and founding policy of Wikipedia.

1. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources.
2. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor.
3. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.
"Articles should rely on credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. For academic subjects, the sources should preferably be peer-reviewed. Sources should also be appropriate to the claims made: outlandish claims beg strong sources."
"The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain. Editors should therefore provide references. If an article topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic."


[edit] Cleanup

Hi, I recently cleaned up a lot of sections that do not belong in our encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not your school's web page and it is not a place to let students know about your policies or vacation days. Thanks!--mboverload@ 21:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

This is in fact not my school - you say Wikipedia is not a place to let students know about "vacation" days, yet you have left some of the dates section. What is allowed and what is not? --Alex9891 (talk) 21:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I've added back the rest of the dates, as I believe they are beneficial to the article. If there is a rule regarding this would you be so kind as to provide a link to the page where it says so? --Alex9891 (talk) 22:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
WP:NOT a container of discriminate information or a how-to guide (when to come to school). Plus, the link to the school website will list the dates which is much better than giving people potentially wrong information that has changed. I hope this addresses your question? =D --mboverload@ 22:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
It does, I agree now, but I'm not sure of this link to the school website - where is it? --Alex9891 (talk) 22:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Subject List

I have created a table for the subject rooms. --Alex talk here 17:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't think that data is relevant, and the list makes the page look ugly - it's what needs cleaning up for that cleanup sign to go away. I think that my little paragraph of prose would suffice for the article to say what the school does and doesn't have. This paragraph is:
"There are currently approximately 70 classrooms in the school, including a hall, a gymnasium, a sports hall, a drama studio, several I.T. rooms, food technology labs, many science labs, 3 canteens, and large outdoor areas that students can make use off when not in class."
I'm sorry for removing your small bit on the sound shak, I'm sure this was a mistake. Also, the 2 sections on language college and training school should reside in the history section as they are too small to constitute their own sections. I'm trying here to make the prose as spunky as possible :). I hope this gets to you, I'm avoiding edit waring with you here. Thanks T. Moitie [talk] 19:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
'Tis ok. Yeah, feel free to rewrite the rooms bit in the way you described. --Alex talk here 20:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)