User talk:ChazBeckett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ChazBeckett. |
- Please continue any conversation where it was started.
- Thus if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here.
- I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- If you want to initiate a conversation, please create a new heading.
- Continue existing conversations under existing headings.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- Indent your comments when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Automatically sign your comments using ~~~~.
[edit] Re [1]
We actually have banned an editor, User:BabyDweezil, without first informing her that a ban was proposed against her on the community sanction noticeboard. It appears that this editor was informed of the community ban discussion only when she was blocked indefinitely, and that her appeal of this ban to the Arbitration Committee was rejected on a technicality in the arbitration procedures, though a majority of arbitrators favored acceptance. So, far from constituting "instruction creep", this addition to the header is actually a necessary safeguard to prevent community bans from being effectuated by such a deficient process in the future. John254 04:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- This editor was not blocked as result of a community ban, but instead for "for disruption, violations of WP:NOT, personal attacks, BLP violations, and assumptions of bad faith." Immediately after BD was blocked, User:SlimVirgin (the blocking admin) posted notice on BD's talk page of the discussion (held at AN/I). An hour later the link was updated to point at the CN discussion. I'm not familar enough with the case to debate whether BD should have been blocked or not, but the point is that BD wasn't initially blocked as the result of a community ban discussion. I'm not quite sure how BD could have been notified of a discussion that hadn't yet occurred. ChazBeckett 12:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Exposé (Lost)
Nope that was completely unintentional. Apparently I hit the wrong button when I was trying to revert a change. I've restored the article; thanks for pointing that out!--Isotope23 19:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
