User talk:Charoog10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!


Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as If you are a Jump In fan and you like Keke Palmer,just watch the Runaway Love video,you will see the dumb Keke Plamer herself!) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Flyguy649 07:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Hot Stuff (I Want You Back)‎

Before reverting other editors' edits, you should familiarise yourself with, for example, our Manual of Style. Note also:

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hot Stuff (I Want You Back)

First, you're still not giving edit summaries; why not? Secondly, please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters). --Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

If you continue changing capitalisation against the Wikipedia MoS, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
You've now added uncivil edit summaries to your behaviour. As I'm involved I can't block you myself, so I'll bring this to the attention of other admins. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Charoog, I'm taking it that you're acting in good faith, so I think we should all be cautious about accusing you of vandalism, as I've mentioned to Mel Etitis, but it would certainly be beneficial if you followed wiki style as in the manual. Also, you seem to at times have removed a tag noting that an article is not sourced in circumstances where ... well, the article was not sourced. That seems like a silly thing to get into conflict about. Also, making hostile edit summaries is not a good idea. Mel Etitis is a well respected editor and admin, so uncivil comments don't help your credibility. If there are underlying content issues, you can, of course, always try mediation. I hope these comments will help you to contribute in cooperation with other users here. Metamagician3000 06:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Please observe proper standards for attribution and wikification. In particular please do not make unsourced claims about the future - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, we should follow the style guide - please put headings in correct format - we only capitalise the first word of a heading (apart from proper nouns, of course). Metamagician3000 10:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Doublethetrouble shoot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Doublethetrouble shoot.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Steam (Nicole Scherzinger song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 23:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

We have been through this. Wikipedia has guidelines and policies concerning editing, including specific styles for types of article, as discussed and decided at WikiProjects. You clearly have no interst in any of that, and edit as you want, regardless of anyone else. That's not acceptable. You might think that some bit of formatting looks prettier for an article in which you're interested, but if no other article of the kind uses it, it shouldn't be added. Again, you might have some private knowledge of facts, but if you add them to an article you have to give sources.
Most importantly, regarding the above warning, you must not remove templates such as {{unreferenced}} with no explanation, and without providing sources. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:ToadinMP8.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ToadinMP8.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Headstrong at.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Headstrong at.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits

You've continued to remove {{unreferenced}} templates without adding references, to revert articles from good to bad formatting and style, to move articles from correct to incorrect capitalisation (without correcting doublre redirects or changing the article in line with your new title), etc. As I'm involved in some of these articles I shouldn't really block you from editing myself; I shall therefore take steps to bring in other admins. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Charoog, I've blocked you for 3 days for your disruptive editing. You've had plenty of warnings but refuse to respond to all talk messages, something you have previously been blocked for. I have blocked you for 3 days because the previous one day block didn't seem to have had any impact on you. Your disruption needs to stop right now. Please take a break and rethink your editing style. Sarah 13:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)