Talk:Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I don't think the current page title is how he's best known at all, but he's one of those peers who has spread confusion over how he is best and correctly known - despite what the front cover and copyright page of his autobiography say, he is not "Lord Charles Brocket" (though I've created a redirect from that page). The cover of his autobiography is also a little unclear about whether we should call him Charlie or not! And almost every conceivable variation of Charles + Brocket pops up on either the dust jacket or front pages...
Can I suggest we have this at either Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket or even Charlie Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket (we have Frank Pakenham, 7th Earl of Longford not Francis Pakenham, 7th Earl of Longford for instance). Timrollpickering 16:09, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
He appeared on Bad Lads Army as "Charles Brocket", not "Charlie Brocket". I think Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket would be best. Proteus (Talk) 17:06, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Suggest that the materila relating to Antalya is not appropriate and irrelevant to this page - if indeed it is appropriate and relevant anywhere. Do we have any source references for it.
Categories: Biography articles of living people | Peerage work group articles | Unassessed biography (peerage) articles | Unknown-priority biography (peerage) articles | Baronetcies work group articles | Unassessed biography (baronets) articles | Unknown-priority biography (baronets) articles | Unassessed biography articles