Talk:Charity (play)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan, an attempt to complete and improve the Gilbert and Sullivan related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale for the G&S Project.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Have done initial preparations for the article. Adam Cuerden ^talk 16:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I tweaked this article as much as I can for now. After you are finished with it, let me know, and I'll take another look. See Stedman (1996), Chapter 8. -- Ssilvers 05:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

"Stone, David "In Aid--In Aid of a Deserving Charity..." W. S. Gilbert Society Journal Vol. 2 No. 15: Summer 2004, pp. 452-454"

Sam, I could have sworn that article was on Gilbert's short stories printed in magazines sold for charity, specifically "The Flag", which had just been rediscovered. Am I wrong, and/or was the title reused? Adam Cuerden ^talk 11:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm. Could use a section on the other theme: The fate of the underpriveledged. Well, I'll finish up the Plot first (but I think I'll move away for a bit - we're tripping over each other today. Adam Cuerden ^talk 15:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I hadn't noticed that the Background section duplicates part of the lead. Should we lose it? Adam Cuerden ^talk 06:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I massaged it around now so that we retain all the interesting info without duplicating. -- Ssilvers 17:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

B-class, but IMO all the Gilbert plays except Engaged should be "low" priority for the G&S project unless they are fairly regularly revived. -- Ssilvers 05:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)