Talk:Charisma Carpenter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

[edit] The Playboy Picture

I'm not complaining, but is it really that approiate? Kusonaga 14:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

shrugs Why not? WP:NOT censored. ;) —Nightstallion (?) 14:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, hadn't read that bit there. Then I've got no problem with it whatsoever! Kusonaga 14:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

It's still not really necessary. WarpstarRider 17:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

I think it's a very tasteful image, and much more representative of the topic than the Playboy issue's cover that was originally there. If only one Playboy image is neccessary, I think the interior picture rather than the cover is what should be here. And as far as questions of "appropriateness" go, I agree with Nigtstallion, WP:NOT's censorship section covers this. Since the article already discusses her appearance in Playboy, I see no reason not to show the image. I don't believe it is in any way obscene, or even particularly pornographic. CriticsCritic 5 February 2006 (UTC)

She is just so hot and if I had my way we would have all the playboy pics on here! :) Govvy 10:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

What's so wrong with the picture? Can somebody just put the damn picture up again? --213.200.165.75 09:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Ye, there was nothing wrong with the magazine cover of her on playboy can we have that back? Govvy 13:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

It's back! --213.200.165.75 17:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia sux!

Malicious gossip it should be called, implicitly calling evil demons to possess and evoke embarassing compulsive behavior over any redistributor of the subject under that section. I just wanted to see if an actress that I deem pretty gifted, having got enough roles to make a living – i did not want any anatomical details! Grr!! Twirling his moustaches, does: Rursus 11:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea of what you are trying to say here!! Govvy 12:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)