Talk:Characters of the Order of the Stick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Webcomics, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to webcomics on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Characters of the Order of the Stick, or visit the project page for more details on the projects. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
This... really needs work. The Elan and latter half of the Belkar articles are just sad, not to mention (in the Elan one, anyway) POV. The article claims that "I'm a pinapple chunk" and whatnot is one of his most famous quotes, when, in all honesty, I can't even remember him saying it. We need to seriously re-write this, and consider a spoiler tag for all the OotS readers that aren't up-to-date.
- I have the time and the knowledge-- at least of the comic, though I'm quite the novice about D&D itself. Can you be more specific about individual parts of the article that are bothering you? ekedolphin 05:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Elan's quote refers to a one-shot comic involving a gelatinous cube; the last frame shows him floating inside of it and claiming to be a chunk of pineapple.
[edit] Those assasins
Shouldn't that dwarf and the shadow dude from the hotel be added?
[edit] Flumph Reference
The article states that Flumphs are the "only lawful good monster in original D&D". Flumphs do not appear in Original D&D, but appear in Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (1st Edition) in the "Fiend Folio". Further, Gold Dragons are also Lawful Good in Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (1st Edition) as are a number of other creatures. I believe the reference should read:
"Two representatives of the only lawful good monster in the 1st Edition Fiend Folio were introduced as inhabitants of Dorukan's Pit, which was full of monsters that were never updated to 3rd Edition."
[edit] Vaarsuvius' Gender Debate
While Vaarsuvius has been, on occasion, referred to as male, (s)he has also been referred to as "sir or madam", [1], and in the same comic strip was referred to as both "that elf chick" and "the elf dude". [2] See also the strip in which Belkar expressed his own ambiguous opinion about the subject. [3]
It's been made pretty clear that no one really knows whether V is male or female. When someone refers to V as "he" or "she", they're simply going by what their interpretation of hir gender identity is, not what hir actual identity is. ekedolphin 08:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's more than just not knowing. Vaarsuvius' gender has been deliberately ambiguous nearly since the beginning, and as such, the character should be referred to androgynously whenever possible.
- When speaking casually, the series creator uses "he". This is not meant to suggest his perceptions, but rather it was chosen because "he" has less key presses than she, (s)he or sie.
- I suggest that we either use the awkward Sie and hir notation, use both male and female in an alternating manner, or just bite the bullet and admit that for now, Vaarsuvius is an It. –Gunslinger47 05:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- And also because "he" is the proper gender-neutral personal pronoun in the English language on those rare occasions when one is needed... Rogue 9 13:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Haley's cryptogram?
Does Haley's speech use the same letter substitution scheme throughout the whole ordeal? If so, what exactly is it, and maybe that should be included in the article? --Cyde↔Weys 16:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Afraid not, no. Every comic has a different key for the cryptogram. See the OoTS forums for an EXTENSIVE thread of 'What Haley says' which includes all the keys for the code. --Tim (talk), (contribs) 20:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Haley (disambiguation)
misdirected page
eh, theres also a helay on Lewis Zimmerman that is unrelated
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.32.20.122 (talk • contribs).
- Problem solved, and then some. Check out the Haley page in all its glory. –Gunslinger47 06:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] On Elan's relation to the rest of the party
In Haley's description it says: "some of the other party members can't stand Elan". That is an exaggeration. Roy often finds him next to worthless and terribly annoying and has expressly stated that he would be glad to be rid of him. Vaarsuvius occasionally finds him irritating. Belkar likes him, Haley loves him and Durkon has yet to express an opinion. That makes Elan more universally liked in the party than Belkar or V. I am changing that to "Roy usually and Vaarsuvius occasionally finds Elan's stupidity terribly enervating"
I am also adding a comment about Elan being a demonstration of the fact that if your charisma is high enough you do not really need to be good at anything else.
Sensemaker
Durkon likes Elan. He has called him "tha heart o' the team" and was willing to listen to Haley's plan to rescue him. He also seemed concerned about both Roy and Elan after they were attacked by assassins.
The User with Pi as Their Number 11:06
[edit] Nits
1. As discussed extensively on the OotS' boards, Belkar's Wisdom must be 10, not 7-10. (If it was 7-9, even the Owl's Wisdom would not allow him to have the ability score necessary to cast CSW.)
2. Also as discussed on the OotS' boards, V's ability to scribe a 7th-level spell does not necessarily mean V is 13th-level. (There are no level requirements for scribing.)
- In any event, all of this fails WP:OR and the boards do not constitute reliable sources. JoshuaZ 20:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] character quotes
Are they really necessary? It's not like character personalities can be summed up in any single quote... --Pentasyllabic 23:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree with you; they're not really necessary. They don't provide any accurate summation of the character, particularly as, as single quotes, they have to be taken out of context. --Tailkinker 06:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article Length
I'm thinking that this article's getting pretty long these days, inevitable given the number of characters that have now appeared. I'm thinking that we should split off certain characters onto their own individual pages, namely a seperate page for each member of the Order, and a page for the Linear Guild, which is quite a sizable section. Unless anyone expresses any counter-opinion in the next day or so, I shall do this. --Tailkinker 09:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stereotypes
A great many characters in the story relate to stereotypes, particularly those in fantasy fiction and RPGs. Some are stereotypes (V -the quitessential intellectual, Elan the dumb blonde), some are counterstereotypes (Belkar the homicidal halfling) and some do their best to fit in the stereotype role (Xykon). I have pointed out this explicitly in many character descriptions. Perhaps it should be added as a separate heading what characters refer to what stereotype. -Sensemaker
Other examples may include the counterstereotype of Roy Greenhilt, the intelligent fighter, as well as Elan's evil twin bro Nale who, like Xykon, tries to fit in the stereotype role (that is, the role of evil genius) that he has been cast in. - Numbuh3.14
[edit] Bandit Clan added
How could this article be missing Samantha's bandit clan? That plotline was 20-some-odd comics long and one of my favorites! Regardless, I've added the clan information under Minor Characters. If you think it needs any improvement, discuss. --Smoke Rulz 22:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Changes to Miko Bio.
Miko is many things, but not exactly stereotypical. Paladins are stereotypically often pleasant and urbane. Miko very probably has a charisma score of at least 16 based on combat analysis in Rich's fight descriptions and the strips, based on use of Lay on hands, Smite Evil, and Divine Grace. She does not regard the OotS as her 'party.' The party never states that all paladins have a stick up their ass. Declaring Miko has an entire tree up her rectum HAS to violate NPOV guidelines. Haley is not, in fact, decisively greedy, if reports of her father's imprisonment are to be believed. There is no evidence Miko considers Durkon an enemy prior to her encounter with Xykon. Of COURSE Windstriker remains loyal and aids her in combat. He's a *class feature.* All paladins mounts also have unusual intelligence and are capable of understanding speech. There is no evidence that all non_Belkar OotS party members are Good. Added a minor section on Xykon's motives in permitting Miko's escape.
82.141.243.217 16:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Monster or Creature?
Noticed a bit of to-ing and fro-ing on the title for our friend under the Hello Goblin umbrella, regarding whether he should be referred as "The Monster in the Darkness" or "The Creature in the Darkness". Seems to me that we should try to come to some sort of consensus on this, simply because the character's linked to from a couple of other articles, and if the title keeps getting changed, it's going to foul up those links.
Personally, I'm not terribly bothered which one we pick; my choice would probably be to call him "The Creature in the Darkness" on the grounds that that's the name that he's listed under on the "Cast of Characters" page in the No Cure for the Paladin Blues collected edition - that's presumably Burlew's name for the character, so it would seem sensible to use it. On the other hand, "The Monster in the Darkness" is still a perfectly accurate description, and it's also what the current links point to, so it would be somewhat easier to keep it that way (not that changing the links would be hard, however).
Any views? --Tailkinker 20:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't care, I just wanna know what it looks like and who it is!!! --Das654 20:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hinjo's Promotion to Recurring Character
I feel at this point, Hinjo is no longer a minor character, but rather significant enough to be moved up to recurring character. Thusly, I have done so. And that's that then. ShadowHare 05:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
