Chasing Sleep
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Chasing Sleep | |
---|---|
The nightmare begins when you open your eyes... |
|
Directed by | Michael Walker |
Produced by | Thomas Bidegain |
Written by | Michael Walker |
Starring | Jeff Daniels Emily Bergl Gil Bellows Zach Grenier Julian McMahon Ben Shenkman Molly Price Patrick Moug |
Cinematography | Jim Denault |
Editing by | David Leonard |
Distributed by | Canal+ |
Release date(s) | September 16, 2001 (Video) |
Running time | 104 min. |
Country | USA |
Language | English |
All Movie Guide profile | |
IMDb profile |
Chasing Sleep is a psychological thriller/horror film written and directed by Michael Walker released to video in 2001. It depicts the reaction of a college professor who awakens to find his wife missing. It stars Jeff Daniels and Emily Bergl.
Contents |
[edit] Plot Synopsis
A college professor wakes up to find his wife has not returned home, and then struggles to understand her disappearance.
[edit] Cast
- Jeff Daniels as Ed Saxon
- Emily Bergl as Sadie
- Gil Bellows as Det. Derm
- Zach Grenier as Geoffrey Costas
- Julian McMahon as George
- Ben Shenkman as Officer Stewart
- Molly Price as Susie
- Patrick Moug as Det. Snyder
[edit] Theories
Viewers have been discussing over the internet (including on IMDb [1]) explanations of the film's ambiguous ending. Several theories have developed from these discussions:
Spoiler warning: Plot and/or ending details follow.
- One theory is that Ed Saxon did indeed kill his wife but is unable to accept what he has done. He tries to suppress these feelings of grief by taking pills and extra doses of medications which leads him to view hallucinations.
- These hallucinations, as it has been theorized, are abstractions of the truth.
- The large and disformed baby Saxon sees is a representation of the unborn child that was present within his wife's womb. The child is ugly and revolting since it is not Saxon's child but rather that of another man, thus Saxon finds the child to be an abomination.
- The baby is cut up and murdered in the bath tub because that is representative of the location where Ed murdered his wife, along with the unborn child.
- The eerie noises coming from the pipes represents the haunting reminder of the deed Saxon has done. He must have cut the body into small enough pieces to flush them away into the pipes, which is why Saxon is so worried about his plumbing issues and the film focuses so heavily on imagery of the pipes.
- The neighbors next door are in fact non-existent; rather, they are representations of the troubled relationship between Saxon and his wife.
- It has been suggested that the house is a metaphor for Saxon's mind. In fact, The Chicago Reader states that "Walker does pull an impressive Kubrickian trick by turning the antiseptic, deteriorating house into a metaphor for Daniels's mental state" [2]. There has been debate over which rooms represent which cognitive areas.
Spoilers end here.
- The director has remained silent about the meaning of the film's story thus creating no definite right or wrong answer. These are just the most commonly accepted theories among viewers.
[edit] Critical Response
- Reviews of Chasing Sleep have often quoted the film as being similar in tone to a David Lynch or a Roman Polanski film. The reason for this is because the film features the same type of surreal flourishes and ambiguous endings found within Lynch films while drawing heavily on the themes of isolation and alienation; motifs often found within Polanski's films. Reel Film Reviews even calls the film "a wonderfully creepy riff on Polanski's Repulsion" [3] and DVD Review finds the film to be "somewhere between Franz Kafka, David Lynch, and a plumber's nightmare" [4].
- Reviews have been generally favorable towards the film, though none are declaring the film as particularly remarkable or innovative. Many review sites have given the film a respectable 3 out of 4 stars, including the internet review sites The Video Graveyard [5], Burnout Central [6], and Film Freak Central [7]. Boxoffice Magazine actually bestows a 3 1/2 out of 4 star rating, giving one of the most positive reviews of the film; it calls the film a "smoothly crafted psychological thriller" [8].
- On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has received a 60% rating on the tomatometer certifying the film as fresh[9].
- The most common criticisms of the film amongst reviewers is that the film is slowly paced and ultimately becomes confusing, with seemingly no resolution or explanation to the proceedings. Apollo Guide says the film is "hard to sum up" [10] but adds that it is "grim and atmospheric" as well as being "dark and moody." Indeed, atmosphere is the most praised attribute amongst critics despite the fact the film is hard to decipher. Reel Film Reviews suggests the film "probably would have worked a whole lot better if it had taken a more objective view of the story" and not focused so much on surreal delusions and hallucinations of the main character, which made the film baffling [11].
- Also, Critics are generally bestowing accolades upon the surprising good performance by Jeff Daniels. Critics have cited his performance as "great", "perfectly casted" [12], and even "brilliant" [13]. Reel Film Reviews says Daniels gives a "seriously unhinged performance" [14] while Boxoffice Magazine says that "Daniels is superb at unraveling the wormy anxieties and desperation at the heart of Ed's existence" [15].
[edit] Trivia
- Film Festivals [16]
- 2000 - Toronto Film Festival - Official Selection[17]
- 2001 - Amsterdam Fantastic Film Festival - Official Selection
- 2001 - Brussels International Festival of Fantasy Films - Official Selection
- 2001 - GĂ©rardmer Film Festival - Official Selection
- 2001 - Lund Fantastisk Film Festival - Official Selection
- 2001 - Sweden Fantastic Film Festival - Official Selection
- Awards
- 2001 - GĂ©rardmer Film Festival - Won - Special Jury Prize
- 2001 - Sweden Fantastic Film Festival - Won - Jury Grand Prize
- Film Locations
- Chelsea, Michigan, USA
- Jackson, Michigan, USA
- Stockbridge, Michigan, USA
- Tagline: The nightmare begins when you open your eyes...
- Crazy Credits: At the end of the credits, after the "This is a work of fiction..." disclaimer - The director would like to mention that he was not driving 92 miles per hour through Waterloo and would like his money returned to him. The director was on his way home from the set and was driving the art department van, which was incapable of going that fast.
- The film did not receive a theatrical release within the United States, although Lions Gate Films bought the rights at the Toronto Film Festival. The film instead ran on the festival circuit for a year before premiering on video on September 16th, 2001, by Lions Gate. This lack of a theatrical run explains the film's obscurity and lack of editorial reviews of the film.
- While Chasing Sleep wasn't put in theaters by Lions Gate, it was self-distributed after its video release. It played in theaters in L.A., Seattle, Portland and Chicago.