Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |||||||||||
Argued February 5, 1942 Decided March 9, 1942 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Holding | |||||||||||
A criminal conviction for violating a disorderly conduct law limited to, in a public place, the use of words directly tending to cause a breach of the peace by provoking the person addressed to acts of violence was constitutional. | |||||||||||
Court membership | |||||||||||
Chief Justice: Harlan Fiske Stone Associate Justices: Owen Josephus Roberts, Hugo Black, Stanley Forman Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Frank Murphy, James F. Byrnes, Robert H. Jackson |
|||||||||||
Case opinions | |||||||||||
Majority by: Murphy Joined by: unanimous |
|||||||||||
Laws applied | |||||||||||
U.S. Const. amend. I; NH P. L., c. 378, ยง 2 (1941) |
Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire, Supreme Court of the United States, in which the Court articulated the fighting words doctrine, a limitation of the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech.
was a case decided by theWalter Chaplinsky, a Jehovah's Witness, had said to a New Hampshire town marshal who was attempting to prevent him from preaching: "You are a God-damned racketeer" and "a damned Fascist" and was arrested. The Court, in an unanimous decision, upheld the arrest and stated:
- "There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting" words those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality."
[edit] External links
- Full text of the decision courtesy of Findlaw.com
- First Amendment Library entry on Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
This article related to a U.S. Supreme Court case is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.