Talk:Cat tree

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Redirect

I made this a redirect to Cat because the current article does not have any sources and does not have an encyclopaedic tone. If sources can be provided, it could well be a useful article. As it stands, and as far as I can see from a brief Google search, it cannot stand on its own as an article. No Retreat No Surrender 12:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

All your points are legit, and should be covered by the various templates at the top of the page. Otherwise, you should put the page up for deletion by the admins and not simply redirect the page. The page for Cat does not cover this topic at all and therefor it's a bad redirect. Flamesplash 18:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

What's less useful? A complete absence of an article or a redirect to a germane topic? Is it really useful to have an empty page? It's not very good, really, to write an article then demand that someone else reference it. I'm going to replace the redirect. If you disagree, I think listing it for deletion would be appropriate. No Retreat No Surrender 23:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Again, the proper channel is to list the page for deletion not replace it with a redirect. Since it bothers you so much I will try to dig up a reference for the page. Your effort is appreciated, though perhaps better focused on trashier sections of wikipedia. Flamesplash 01:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)