User talk:Cassmus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Cassmus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: ''Have A Nice Day'' 22:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Decameron

Very nice work! Congrats on completing it. -- Stbalbach 14:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Helpme

I'm trying to create a disambiguation page for "hell week." The primary definition should link to the Navy SEALs, but the secondary definition should link to the technical week article that I just created.--Cassmus 08:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

You have two options. If the Navy usage is much more common, you can simply put:
"Hell week" redirects here, for the play term see Technical week.
At the top of Navy SEALs.
Or you can go to the Hell week page and create a disambigaution page. It would look like:
Hell week may refer to:
{{disambig}}
More info at WP:DAB and WP:MOSADAB. Use {{helpme}} again if you need more help.--Commander Keane 08:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Henry the Black

Is he not that mysterious for you?--Jondel 09:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help me

I just created a stub from information on the Italian Wikipedia about Ghino di Tacco. I want to know if there's any way to request that Italian speaking Wikipedians to translate the article (or at least take the important parts) and add them to my English stub. I don't know much beyond what I wrote in my stub, and from what I can figure out, the Italian article seems to cover the topic well.--Cassmus 09:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi! You can list the article at Wikipedia:Translation#Italian-to-English and a translator will hopefully take a look.--Commander Keane 09:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Did I cite my new Draw-A-Person Test article correctly?--Cassmus 09:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Looks pretty good! Larry V (talk | contribs) 09:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ghino di Tacco

Photo uploaded.. everything should be fine now.. let me know if you need some help with italian articles and/or trasnlations Tatonzolo 07:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Psychology question

Thanks for helping out with the assessments! I've done most of them, but there are a lot of them out there, and I wouldn't mind some help with it. There's really not much to the assessments. Just put {{WikiProject Psychology|class=|importance=}} at the top of the article's talk page to add the article to the WikiProject. You can either assess it right then, come back and do it later, or wait for someone else to assess it. If you want to do it yourself, the assessment information is found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment. The options for "class" are NA, Stub, Start, B, GA, A, and FA. The options for "importance" are Low, Mid, High, and Top. If a page has a class of NA, it should not be given an importance. An importance of Top should be given sparingly. I'm not sure what assessments of yours that I changed, but if I did, it was probably because the assessment was inconsistent with similar articles. For example, therapy methods, psychological organizations, and professional journals generally don't get an importance higher than Mid. If you're not sure how to assess an article's importance, you usually can't go wrong with Mid, or you can just let someone else do it. Also, an article cannot have a class of GA unless it's passed a good article review, and it can't have a class of FA unless it is a featured article. I generally don't like to change someone else's assessment unless I think the change will be uncontroversial. If there's anything else I can do to help out, feel free to ask! —Cswrye 15:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rating the ToK

Hi. I'm trying to get members of the Psychology Project to get together and rate the both the quality and importance of the Tree of Knowledge System. Hope you're interested. Have a great day! EPM 19:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for peer review

The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] West Side Story

Thanks for your note. I help when I can. I'm not perfect either. Wahkeenah 14:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)