Talk:Castles and Dreams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Albums because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Albums}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Album}} template, removing {{Albums}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Contents

[edit] Release date?

"It was released as a Region 2 DVD on May 30, 2005 after being pushed back quite a few times. It was released as a Region 2 DVD on October 11, 2005."

Which of the two dates is it? Probably worth picking one and sticking to it :)

--Telsa 18:40, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Good call. Thanks for pointing it out. :) Lizzy 23:22, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was No move (no point in relisting, Gene is right). Duja 15:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


Castles and DreamsCastles & Dreams — There is "&" at the coverpage of the DVD. Geevee (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

[edit] Survey - in support of the move

[edit] Survey - in opposition to the move

  1. Oppose. Typography on the cover of an album shouldn't be determinative of anything. Including non-alphanumeric characters in article names is generally not a good idea. I'd think it is at best a toss-up between the two choices, and in that case there's no good reason for a move. Gene Nygaard 17:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.