Casio F91W

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Casio F91W, in daily alarm mode.  The watch is currently set to ring an alarm, and flash its light, at 7:30am.
Casio F91W, in daily alarm mode. The watch is currently set to ring an alarm, and flash its light, at 7:30am.

The Casio F91W is an inexpensive model of digital watch, manufactured by the Japanese firm Casio. It has a daily alarm and a 1/100 second stopwatch.

Since the watch was introduced it has only been updated once. The change was to the backlight which went from the standard light in older watches to the blue 'micro-light' seen in most of today watches.

The watch is controlled by three pushbuttons. The upper left button turns on the backlight, cancels the alarm, and is used for selecting settings. The lower left button cycles the modes of the watch: → Alarm → Stopwatch → Time adjustment and back to the normal time display. The button on the right is the function button: it starts and stops the stopwatch, and changes the settings currently being adjusted. The watch's display shows the day of the week, day of the month, hour, minutes, seconds, and the signs for PM (or 24-hour clock), alarm signal, and hourly signal.

In stopwatch mode, minutes, seconds and one-hundredths of a second are shown and a LAP feature (temporary pause) is available.

This watch is widely available through the world in various packaging, including a version with a 'chrome' case and strap available in the USA at Fry's and other outlets.

Contents

[edit] Claimed use in terrorism

This model of watch is notable because United States intelligence officials have identified it as the watch that terrorists use when constructing time bombs.[1] Ahmed Ressam, the millennial bomber, bought two Casio F91W.[2]

When the Department of Defense was forced to comply with US District Court justice Jed Rakoff's court order to release the documents from Guantanamo detainees' Combatant Status Review Tribunals it became known that the allegations against at least 17 of the Guantanamo detainees justified their continued detention because they had been wearing this model of watch, when captured.[3]

Casio officials declined to be interviewed about the U.S. intelligence accusations.[2] But Casio did issue a statement, where they said the watch "has no exclusive technology," and, "Casio continues to work closely with all government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security to help limit any potential threats and deal with security concerns."

Detainees who testified to their surprise and confusion over this allegation have described their watches, and those descriptions have not matched the description of the F91W. Their descriptions have mentioned built-in compasses and calculators -- features the F91W lacks.

[edit] Detainees whose continued detention was justified by their ownership of a Casio watch

Mohammed Ahmad Said Al Edah
  • Al Edah was alleged to have been wearing a Casio 195W, "the silver version of the F91W".[4]
  • Al Edah's Personal Representative challenged the logic behind linking ownership of a popular watch to membership in a terrorist organization.
Abdullah Kamel Abdullah Kamel Al Kandari
  • Told his Tribunal he had no idea that the watch was associated with terrorism[5][6]
  • Told his Tribunal that the four Muslim chaplains at Guantanamo all wore this model of watch.[7]
  • Described the features of his watch that signal the call to prayers to a devout Muslim.[8]
  • Told his Tribunal if he had known Casio watches were tied to terrorism: "If I had known that, I would have thrown (the watch) away."[9]
Abdelaziz Kareem Salim al-Noofayee
  • Told his Tribunal: "The guards here wear the same Casio watch I did. The watch I was wearing looked like the same one the guards wear here. Does that mean they're al-Qaeda members?"[10][11]
Hani Abdul Muslih al Shulan
  • Captured wearing an F91W.[12]
Sabri Mohammed Ebrahim
  • Told his Tribunal "All I know about the watch is that it is a Casio... I know it has a compass. When we pray we have to face Mecca"[13]
Usama Hassan Ahmend Abu Kabir
  • Told his Tribunal, "I have a Casio watch due to the fact that they are inexpensive and they last a long time. I like my watch because it is durable. It had a calculator and was waterproof, and before prayers we have to wash up all the way to my elbows."[14]
Abdul Matin
  • Told his tribunal: "This watch is not from al-Qaida, it's not used for a bomb, This is just a regular watch. All older, younger men and women use this watch everywhere."[14]
Mazin Salih Musaid
  • Musaid pointed out to his Tribunal: "Millions and millions of people have these types of Casio watches."[14]
Salih Uyar
  • Told his Tribunal, "If it's a crime to carry this watch? Your own military personnel also carry this watch, too, Does that mean that they're just terrorists as well?"[15][16]
Mosa Zi Zemmori
  • Ownership of a Casio watch was listed as one of the factors in favor of his continued detention.[17]
Mesut Sen
  • Ownership of a Casio watch was listed as one of the factors in favor of his continued detention.[18]
Abdul Rahman Abdul Abu Ghiyth Sulayman
  • Captured wearing a Casio F91W.[19]
Ahmed Yaslam Said Kuman
  • Ownership of a Casio watch was listed as one of the factors in favor of his continued detention.[20]
Tariq Shallah Hasan Al Alawi Al Harbi
  • Ownership of a Casio watch was listed as one of the factors in favor of his continued detention.[21]
Fadil Husayn Salih Hintif
  • "The detainee was captured while in possession of a Casio watch model that has been used in bombings linked to al Qaida and radical Islamic terrorist groups with improvised explosive devices.[22]"
Muhammad Abd Allah Mansur Al Futuri
  • "The detainee was in possession of a wristwatch, the type used in improvised explosive device bombings linked to al Qaida and radical Islamic terrorists.[23]"
Saeed Ahmed Mohammed Abdullah Sarem Jarabh
  • "The detainee was in possession of a watch type that has been used in bombing linked to radical terrorist improvised explosive devices.[24]"
Shabir Ahmed
  • One of the factors favoring continued detention, offered to his Administrative Review Board, to justify his continued detention, was:[25]
    "The detainee possessed a Casio watch, the model of which has been used in bombings that have been linked to al Qaida with improved [sic] explosive devices."

[edit] References

  1. ^ "Why Am I in Cuba?", Mother Jones (magazine), July 12, 2006
  2. ^ a b Guantanamo Captives Jailed Because Of Digital Watches, WCVB, March 10, 2006
  3. ^ Guantanamo: what you need to know, Alternet
  4. ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Mohammed Ahmad Said Al Edah's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 22-30
  5. ^ documents from Abdullah Kamel Abdullah Kamel Al Kandari's Combatant Status Review Tribunal
  6. ^ Sketches of Guantanamo detainees-Part II, Boston Globe, March 15, 2006
  7. ^ Voices Baffled, Brash and Irate in Guantánamo, New York Times, March 6, 2006
  8. ^ Guantanamo detainee accused of having digital watch, Dawn (newspaper), March 8, 2006
  9. ^ Detainees' cases show another side of Gitmo, USA Today, November 3, 2004
  10. ^ Incoherencies, Eponymies: Proofs of Accusations Often Skimpy, Le Monde, March 13, 2006
  11. ^ Details of some hearings involving Guantanamo detainees, Fox News
  12. ^ Details of some hearings involving Guantanamo detainees, Fox News
  13. ^ US releases more Guantanamo files, BBC, April 4, 2006
  14. ^ a b c Common Casio watch becomes evidence at Guantanamo, Associated Press, March 9, 2006
  15. ^ Details from the Guantanamo Transcripts, NPR
  16. ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Salih Uyar's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - mirror - pages 15-21
  17. ^ Administrative Review Board - factors in favor of continued detention or release (.pdf), US Department of Defense - page 101-102
  18. ^ Factors for and against the continued detention (.pdf), of Mesut Sen Administrative Review Board - page 1
  19. ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Abdul Rahman Abdul Abu Ghiyth Sulayman's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 23-31
  20. ^ Factors for and against the continued detention (.pdf) of Ahmed Yaslam Said Kuman Administrative Review Board - page 65
  21. ^ Factors for and against the continued detention (.pdf) of Tariq Shallah Hasan Al Alawi Al Harbi Administrative Review Board, March 4, 2005 - page 66
  22. ^ CSRT Summary of Evidence memorandum (.pdf) prepared for Fadil Husayn Salih Hintif's Combatant Status Review Tribunals - October 25, 2004 - page 67
  23. ^ Summary of Evidence memo (.pdf) prepared for Muhammad Abd Allah Mansur Al Futuri's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - September 29, 2004 - page 244
  24. ^ Factors for and against the continued detention (.pdf) of Saeed Ahmed Mohammed Abdullah Sarem Jarabh Administrative Review Board - page 60
  25. ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Shabir Ahmed's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 203-216

[edit] External links