Talk:Carl's Afternoon in the Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	Dogs Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.

This reads like a book review, which is nice, but it doesn't express a neutral point of view. Some countervailing opinions would seem appropriate. --Kelly Martin 02:32, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)

A very fair point. I'm tempted to read this book if only to overhaul the entry. Perhaps someone familiar with the work could come in instead? I feel that this (depending on the traffic it receives) is more a case for deletion until someone can come along and pen something truly worthwhile. -- Steve McFarland 02:02, March 26, 2005 (PST)

I tried rewriting it, as a result I think it's more NPOV but less well written. --CVaneg 07:04, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I don't think we should get too extreme about NPOV... wiki consensus seems to be that any commercially published book is notable and deserving of an entry, but do we really need a full literary analysis and critique? I'll pull the NPOV flag, since there's nothing along the lines of "this is the best book ever" in the article right now. Feco 05:27, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)