Talk:Cannabis rescheduling in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is undergoing a featured article review to ensure that it meets the standards of a featured article. Please add a comment to assist the process and/or be bold and improve the article directly. If the article has been moved from its initial review period to the Featured Article Removal Candidate (FARC) section, you may support or contest its removal. When the review is complete, a bot will update the article talk page.


Featured article star Cannabis rescheduling in the United States is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Main Page trophy

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 16, 2005.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cannabis rescheduling in the United States article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies

Contents

[edit] Archives


Under 'Factors determinative of scheduling' do we mean "Its psychic [sic] or physiological dependence liability"??? Psychiatric/psychological dependence liability, perhaps.

That wording comes straight out of the United States Code. Rad Racer 15:37, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] FA status

The 40 odd external jumps need converted into footnotes and the citation tag needs taking care of or the FA status may be in jeopardy.Rlevse 21:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Table of Contents (Side Box)

Is it possible to fix this article's Table of Contents? The Schedule List on the right is simply for reference, not six seperate sections of the article... /Blaxthos 01:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I fixed the side box as best I knew how, but the "Sections" within them still are fouling it up (and the edit tags around the article. I am not experienced enough to fix it completely. /Blaxthos 09:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Critical information missing

Why is it that there's such an abundance of information about efforts to decriminalize marijuana, but after a rather exhaustive search, I can find no mention of how it came to be criminalized in the first place? Systemic bias? Or is this just part of the vast right-wing conspiracy at work? Tomertalk 06:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Exhaustive search? Maybe in the wrong places ;) Read Legal issues of cannabis, The campaign against marijuana, and Why is Marijuana Illegal?. --Thoric 23:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)