Talk:Camp Yawgoog
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Camp Yawgoog is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Too Extensive?
I actually attended Yawgoog for several summers a while back, and bear no ill will towards it, but, come on. A history of the nature building's heating system? A list of every badge and segment offered? I just don't know that the camp is notable enough for such a ... detailed article. Perhaps it should be cut down a little. Thatcrazycommie 13:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
Sections of camps really don't need another article, and some of the Kelly article is not encyclopedic. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 13:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Agree, merge it into Yawgood. Rlevse 18:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Agree --63.224.140.19 02:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
Merged per nom. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 19:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Grammar
Edited some grammar in the section on Camps. --158.123.160.2 18:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- You don't need to note minor stuff like this on the talk page: use the edit summary. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 18:54, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Redirects
I added a redirect from Yawgoog Scout Reservation- since that's what I would assume the article should be titled, as it is the official name of the camp. Should the article's title be changed? --Kenundrum
I just added a redirect from Yawgoog KB1KOI 23:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reassessment request
I can not upgrade this as it's already a B-class article. To get GA, you have to go through the formal GA nomination process, ditto for FA. I can assess an article as A-class, but this one is not there yet. My first round of suggestions to get it there are: expand the lead to summarize the article, add lots more refs, expand the history significantly (there has to be more than a para worth), and format the images so there's more than one on a line. I do agree it's way better than before and the camps section is very good. Rlevse 20:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
