Talk:Caml

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. -- Kjkolb 05:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Categorical Abstract Machine Language → Caml – No longer an acronym. Should get an otheruses or similar template referring to CAML. Qwertyus 23:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

  • Support Qwertyus 23:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Does one really need a reference to claim that a function is more easily expressed as a function? [in a functional form]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/a/m/Talk%7ECaml_afe1.html"