User talk:Calicore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Calicore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 06:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] My userpage
Thank you for your edits to my userpage ILovePlankton 23:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CAPITALS
Please see Talk:HANADEKA (and reply there rather than here or on my talk page). Thanks. -- Hoary 10:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hanadeka is all fixed now; and I've also adjusted most of the links that were previously pointing to HANADEKA (in principle, all the links that were not within signed contributions). Thanks again for your understanding. -- Hoary 01:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Hope I don't seem to be stalking you, but I took a look at another of your pages, and did some tidying there too. A couple of my changes might look odd, so I'll explain them. I deleted the link to one category, because there was anyway also a link to another category that is (or should be!) a subcategory of it. Secondly, I deleted the two "see also"s, because both links are anyway prominent at the very start of the article. I hope my edits seem OK; you are, of course, free to disagree. -- Hoary 10:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WHY?????
You think my article on Robert benfer, or Knox, should be deleted for INSANE reasons. Please, i want him to be known, i ask you, PLEASE keep my article... please :(
Philber 22 00:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Philber 22
[edit] License tagging for Image:Miseryisabutterfly.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Miseryisabutterfly.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Srry
K, srry 4 blamin' you, i'm just kinda new at deletion ruules or what certain things mean. So i'm srry. :)
plz 4give me. Philber 22 21:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Philber 22
[edit] Athsma
#REDIRECT [[Page Name]] is the correct markup. I have reverted it back. -- Francs2000 22:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cryptogammic soil
You created this redirect on June 11, 2006. It has no other history and no current article links to it. Barring some history that is not apparent to me, it may meet CSD G7 criteria for speedy deletion. Would you be able to tag the article accordingly? -- Paleorthid 23:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Yoko ueno.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Yoko ueno.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 04:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of films with similar themes and release dates AfD
Hi, you've expressed an opinion in the deletion discussion of this article. I've recently suggested a compromise in hopes of improving the article while keeping both sides happy, and would appreciate if you could revisit the issue. Thanks. --Wafulz 18:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bai ling.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bai ling.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 00:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jana.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Prices for Harajuku Lovers
Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Gwen Stefani are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! ShadowHalo 08:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)