User talk:CalPaterson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Jesus Army
Cal, there would be no problem with a section that said "Jesus Army has been described as a cult", which then went on to cite sources that do so describe it, but there's a real problem with saying that some think it's a cult in the introduction. I agree that the article should not be entirely onesided. It's not the inclusion of criticism that I have a problem with, only how it's included. James James 00:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- This is a fair comment. I will work towards moving this into a section. Hopefully before I hit the hay; ;). Thankyou. Criticism appreciated. --CalPaterson 00:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)