California state elections, 2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Elections in California

Gubernatorial Elections:
1861 · 1958 · 1962 · 1966 · 1970 · 1974
1978 · 1982 · 1986 · 1990 · 1994 · 1998
2002 · 2003 (recall) · 2006


Legislative Elections:
Senate 2006 Assembly 2006


Judicial Elections:
Appeals Courts 2006


Special Elections:
The 5 special elections of 1998/1999
2003 gubernatorial recall
2005 statewide special election
2005 5th congressional district
2005 48th congressional district
2006 50th congressional district


Other Elections:
2004 Presidential Election in California
2006 United States Senate election

California's state elections were held November 7, 2006. Necessary primary elections were held on June 6. Up for election were the California State Assembly, 20 members of the California Senate, seven constitutional officers, members of the California Board of Equalization, two Supreme Court justices, various appeals court judges, and municipal officers.

Incumbent governor Arnold Schwarzenegger retained a wide lead in the polls [1] to win re-election over his Democratic challenger, current California Treasurer Phil Angelides [2]. Democrats were expected to retain the majority of state seats, and possibly gain two or three U.S. House seats.

Contents

[edit] Constitutional officers

[edit] Governor

See also California gubernatorial election, 2006.

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[3]

2006 gubernatorial election, California
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger (incumbent) 4,850,157 55.9 +7.3
Democratic Phil Angelides 3,376,732 39.0 +7.5
Green Peter Camejo 205,995 2.3 -0.5
Libertarian Art Olivier 114,329 1.3 +1.3
Peace and Freedom Janice Jordan 69,934 0.8 +0.8
American Independent Edward C. Noonan 61,901 0.7 +0.7
Total votes 8,679,048 100.0%
Majority 1,473,425 16.9 -0.2
Turnout 8,899,059 39.3 -3.8

[edit] Lieutenant Governor

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[4]

2006 Lieutenant Governors of California election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic John Garamendi 3,694,508 49.2%
Republican Tom McClintock 3,392,776 45.2%
Green Donna J. Warren 204,865 2.8%
Libertarian Lynnette Marie Shaw 123,036 1.7%
American Independent James D. King 59,949 0.7%
Peace and Freedom Stewart A. Alexander 37,450 0.4%
Total votes 7,512,584 100.0%
Majority 301,732 4.0%
Turnout

[edit] Secretary of State

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[5]

2006 California Secretary of State election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Debra Bowen 3,563,217 48.3%
Republican Bruce McPherson (incumbent) 3,320,100 45.0%
Green Forrest Hill 155,791 2.1%
Libertarian Gail Lightfoot 150,492 2.1%
American Independent Glenn McMillon, Jr. 119,094 1.6%
Peace and Freedom Margie Akin 78,464 1.0%
Total votes 7,387,158 100.0%
Majority 243,117 3.3%
Turnout

[edit] Controller

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[6]

2006 California State Controller election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic John Chiang 3,736,149 50.8%
Republican Tony Strickland 2,965,466 40.3%
Green Laura Wells 223,607 3.0%
Peace and Freedom Elizabeth C. Barron 184,349 2.5%
Libertarian Donna Tello 165,658 2.2%
American Independent Warren M. Campbell 93,070 1.2%
Total votes 7,368,299 100.0%
Majority 770,683 10.5%
Turnout

[edit] Treasurer

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[7]

2006 California State Treasurer election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Bill Lockyer 3,993,303 54.5%
Republican Claude Parrish 2,732,325 37.3%
Libertarian Marian Smithson 292,514 4.0%
Green Mehul M. Thakker 171,612 2.3%
American Independent E. Justin Noonan 81,585 1.1%
Peace and Freedom Gerald Sanders 62,145 0.8%
Total votes 7,333,484 100.0%
Majority 1,260,978 17.2%
Turnout

[edit] Attorney General

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[8]

2006 California Attorney General election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Jerry Brown 4,191,712 56.4%
Republican Chuck Poochigian 2,842,596 38.2%
Green Michael Sutton Wyman 167,329 2.3%
Libertarian Kenneth A. Weissman 156,016 2.0%
Peace and Freedom Jack Harrison 87,151 1.1%
Total votes 7,444,804 100.0%
Majority 1,349,116 18.2%
Turnout

[edit] Insurance Commissioner

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[9]

2006 California Insurance Commissioner election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican Steve Poizner 3,734,686 50.9%
Democratic Cruz Bustamante 2,826,884 38.6%
Libertarian Dale F. Ogden 269,060 3.7%
Green Larry Cafiero 233,537 3.1%
Peace and Freedom Tom Condit 162,049 2.2%
American Independent Jay Earl Burden 111,605 1.5%
Total votes 7,337,821 100.0%
Majority 907,802 12.3%
Turnout

[edit] Board of Equalization

[edit] District 1

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[10]

2006 State Board of Equalization District 1 election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Betty T. Yee 1,288,742 64.7%
Republican David J. Neighbors 588,735 29.6%
Libertarian Kennita Watson 58,445 2.9%
Peace and Freedom David Campbell 57,719 2.8%
Total votes 1,993,641 100.0%
Majority 700,007 35.1%
Turnout

[edit] District 2

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[11]

2006 State Board of Equalization District 2 election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican Bill Leonard (incumbent) 975,290 55.7%
Democratic Tim Raboy 665,891 38.0%
Peace and Freedom Richard R. Perry 63,543 3.6%
Libertarian Willard Del Michlin 49,031 2.7%
Total votes 1,753,755 100.0%
Majority 309,399 17.7%
Turnout

[edit] District 3

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[12]

2006 State Board of Equalization District 3 election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican Michelle Steel 1,033,471 57.1%
Democratic Mary Christian-Heising 697,687 38.5%
Peace and Freedom Mary Lou Finley 81,507 4.4%
Total votes 1,812,665 100.0%
Majority 335,784 18.6%
Turnout

[edit] District 4

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[13]

2006 State Board of Equalization District 4 election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Judy May Chu 970,265 65.2%
Republican Glen Forsch 412,077 27.7%
Libertarian Monica W. Kadera 67,889 4.6%
Peace and Freedom Cindy Varela Henderson 38,424 2.5%
Total votes 1,488,655 100.0%
Majority 558,188 37.5%
Turnout

[edit] Judicial system

[edit] Supreme Court of California

Final results from the California Secretary of State:[14]

Associate Justice Joyce L. Kennard, Seat 1
Vote on retention Votes % ±%
Yes 3,889,233 74.6%
No 1,329,436 25.4%
Total votes 5,218,669 100.0%
Majority 2,559,797 49.2%
Turnout
Associate Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Seat 2
Vote on retention Votes % ±%
Yes 3,824,569 74.4%
No 1,317,894 25.6%
Total votes 5,142,463 100.0%
Majority 2,506,675 48.8%
Turnout

[edit] California Courts of Appeal

See California Courts of Appeal elections, 2006.

[edit] California State Legislature elections

See: California state legislature elections, 2006.

[edit] Statewide Ballot Propositions

Thirteen propositions, including five bond measures, qualified to be listed on the general election ballot in California. All five bond measures passed, but only two non-bonds, 83 and the bond-like 84, won approval.

[edit] Proposition 1A

1A would amend the California constitution to limit the conditions under which the transfer of gasoline sales tax revenues from transportation costs to other uses may be allowed. Suspensions would be treated as loans to the General Fund which must be repaid in full, including interest, and suspensions would not be allowed more than twice every ten years. Additionally, all prior suspensions would need to be paid off before another suspension could be put into affect. Proposition 1A passed with 76.6% approval. [15]

[edit] Proposition 1B

1B authorizes the state to sell $20 billion in bonds to fund transportation projects related to congestion, the movement of goods, air quality and transportation security. Proposition 1B passed with 61.3% approval. [16]

[edit] Proposition 1C

1C authorizes the state to sell $2.85 billion in bonds to fund new and existing housing and development programs. Proposition 1C passed with 57.5% approval. [17]

[edit] Proposition 1D

1D allows the state to sell $10.4 billion in bonds to fund construction and building modernization for K-12 schools and institutions of higher education. Proposition 1D passed with 56.6% approval. [18]

[edit] Proposition 1E

1E authorizes the state to sell $4.1 billion in bonds for flood management programs. Proposition 1E passed with 64.0% approval. [19]

[edit] Proposition 83

Increases the severity of punishments for sex crimes in several ways. It broadens the definition of certain sex offenses, lengthens penalities, prohibits probation for some crimes, eliminates early release credits for some offenses, extends parole for some specific sex offenses, and increases court-imposed fees on sex offenders. 83 is a lengthy and complex proposition, a complete summary of which can be found here. Proposition 83 passed with 70.5% approval. [20]

It effectively blocks offenders from living in the vast majority of the areas of large California cities.

Within 24 hours of its passage, its enforcement was blocked by U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, who ruled in a lawsuit filed by an existinng offender based on its retroactive nature.[1]

[edit] Proposition 84

Allows the state to sell $5.4 billion in bonds to fund programs for safe water supply and quality, flood control, park improvements and natural resource protection. Proposition 84 passed with 53.8% approval. [21]

[edit] Proposition 85

Amends the state constitution to require, except in certain circumstances, doctors to inform the parent or legal guardians of an unemancipated minor at least 48 hours before an abortion is performed on that minor; a process by which the minor can obtain a legal waiver of the notification requirement is also included in the text. Proposition 85 failed to pass with 45.9% approval. [22]

[edit] Proposition 86

Amends the state constitution to increase the excise tax on cigarettes by $.13 a cigarette in order to fund healthcare expansion. Proposition 86 failed to pass with 47.9% approval. [23]

[edit] Proposition 87

Main article: California Proposition 87 (2006)

Imposes a tax of 1.5% to 6% on oil extracted from California (excluding offshore drilling on federally managed land) with the goal of decreasing petroleum consumption in California by 25%. The $4 billion raised by this tax would go towards research into alternative energy sources, as well as incentives for businesses and vehicle owners utlizing alternative energy and energy efficient technology. Proposition 87 failed to pass with 45.3% approval. [24]

[edit] Proposition 88

Amends the state constitution to allow for a $50 "parcel tax" on the ownership of plots of land (with exclusions for certain elderly or disabled landowners) to provide additional public school funding. Proposition 88 failed to pass with 23.1% approval. [25]

[edit] Proposition 89

Main article: California Proposition 89 (2006)

Raises income tax on corporations and financial institutions by .2% in order to fund expanded public campaign funding for eligible state office candidates, and imposes new limits on contributions to campaigns. Proposition 89 failed to pass with 25.5% approval. [26]

[edit] Proposition 90

Limits the ability of state or local governments to seize private land for public use, and significantly increases the compensation the government must provide to landowners if new laws result in a change in value to their property. This proposition is part of a national response to the Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London, in which the Court asserted the right of governments to seize land for private development if it benefits the public at large. Proposition 90 failed to pass with 47.5% approval. [27]

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] References