User talk:Caknuck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Last year's chatter

Contents

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of taco fillings

Please note that I have added List of burrito fillings to this AFD (as suggested by one of the voters); you may wish to add a comment or reconsider your vote. Brianyoumans 23:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

  • That was my suggestion, so it's doubtful I'll raise an objection. Caknuck 04:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Radiodaze.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Radiodaze.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for helping me out on my Ernest Emerson article, particularly with arranging the categories at the bottom as well as my stray typos! Mike Searson 07:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again for reviewing the article. I made the changes you reccomended and agree that they make it better to the reader! Mike Searson 21:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again for your vote for Featured article Status! Mike Searson 01:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hey You!

nothing i have created is useless nonsense why are you gonna be a dick. i mean the maura hogan thing you have a point but nothing on the mike chabmerlinb page is false the exploration of space and time is a club wich he created and he draws crazy faces. I Challenge you to a duel of some sort! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Whereiswarren (talk • contribs).

[edit] Thank you!

Hello, thanks for your peer review of 2005 Texas Longhorn football team. Your suggestions have led to many improvements to the article. I believe I have now addressed or spoken to all of your points. I have put more detail at Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Peer review/2005 Texas Longhorn football team.

I have also addressed most of the points made by the other peer reviewers. The two I am still working on is to expand some of the game sumary sections (I'm working on that now) and to proof-read all the references for consistent format. I am saving this task for the very end since more references are being added as I go.

If you have any other suggestions for the article, please let me know. Best, Johntex\talk 09:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Thank you for supporting my RfA. It was (47/0/0) upon closure and now phase I is complete. I think the tools will aid both me and the encyclopedia. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, or if you think I'm misbehaving I'm always open to recall. Thanks, James086Talk 13:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wrong summary

Your Edit Summary for 00:55, February 26, 2007 (RV to revision 110971076 dated 19:47, 25 February 2007 by Corpx (removing unnecessary external link)) claims you reverted an edit to remove an external link. However, when I checked the diff, your changes involved categories -- not external links. I had just (4 minutes earlier) reverted a YouTube link. Could that be what you where thinking of? Will (Talk - contribs) 07:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Will, see your talk page for my response. Caknuck 07:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

No bot. I used popups by Lupin. I can override the summary with an option I chose.

As for the complex edit, you probably should have made the revert a separate edit. You might have gotten to it before I could. However, the important thing is that your second edit would have a summary like "Adjusted default sort of categories". Will (Talk - contribs) 07:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks for the advice. Caknuck 07:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi from Vishal1976 ( now blocked by vandalist ) and thanks for removing vandalism on article at Khandoba

Hi brother i am Vishal Prakash Dudhane -- Vishal1976 from Pune city , India. I have contributed a lot text and images to Maratha related articles sucah as Maratha clan system , Khandoba , Jyotiba , Paithani , Bhavani etc under the user name Vishal1976. But some jelous , vandalist , anti Maratha forces are trying to destroy my work and they gotta blocked me. All my work was very good , fundamental , true and new to western world. I admit i have hot temper and my cunning foes , enimies used it as wepon against me. You can check at Yahoo serch engine that how after my desertion the rating by yahoo for this articles have fallen considerable and Wikipedia had big loss. If this will go long we all good people will have sever setback and loss. So if you want to help me you may unblocked me and protect my articles and punish this vandalist entites . I have very good plans in my mind for Wikipedia and we can do good.-- with best regards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.17.193.80 (talk) 15:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Your recent edit to Casey Donovan (singer)

(diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Revert gone awry due to an edit conflict. Caknuck 05:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You!

The TomStar81 Spelling Award
Be it known to all members of Wikipedia that Caknuck has corrected my god-awful spelling on the page Armament of the Iowa class battleship, and in doing so has made an important and very significant contribution to the Wikipedia community, thereby earning this TomStar81 Spelling Award and my deepest thanks. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You!

Hi! Thanks for reverting my userpage!Re-evolution 17:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Another Thank you!

You must get this a lot, but thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page. - cgilbert(talk|contribs) 17:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] From 71.251.69.184

WIKIPEDIA THIS IS A BAD WEBSITE FOR PEOPLE LOOKING IT UP FOR SCHOOL THE NEWS SAID THAT THIS WEBSITE IS A BAD FOR CHILDREN SO IT WOULD BE THE SMART THAT KIDS CAN LEARN REAL THINGS FOR LEARNING HOW TO STUDY YOU SHOULD STOP EDITING SO THEN THE KIDS LEARN REAL THINGS BY EXPERTS SO THEN YOU GUYS CAN MAKE PROGRESS.

THANK YOU:) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.251.69.184 (talk) 15:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC).

Eating glass is bad for kids, too. Much worse than WP. What's your point? Caknuck 15:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Tā moko

The mistake was made by User:Af648 here. —Ocatecir Talk 06:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

(Responded on Ocatecir's talk page. Caknuck 06:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC))
Ahh, thanks for the heads up. Happy editing (and vandal fighting). —Ocatecir Talk 06:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Whats wrong with GBH?

Why you keep deleting gooranatar BananaHammock Article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joe4440 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

(Responded on Joe4440's talk page.) Caknuck 21:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Cleveland, Ohio

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Cleveland, Ohio. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Philippe 06:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

(Inaccurate warning, responded on Philippe's talk page.) Caknuck 21:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Well crap, I'm sorry. Not sure how that happened. I'm happy to remove the warning from here, since it's so clearly wrong, if you'd like. Philippe 15:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
(Replied on Philippe's talk page.) Caknuck 15:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players

Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 17:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/a/k/User_talk%7ECaknuck_8143.html"