User talk:Cahk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello Cahk, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance. If you ever get bored, or don't know how to help, visit the ToDo List at Community Portal. There are millions of jobs to be done, article to be improved, written, deleted, images added or edited, and groups/clubs to join!

If you have any questions, or just want a chat, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 19:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:CDNTemp-front.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CDNTemp-front.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:005.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:005.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 18:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:UVic Coat of Arms.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:UVic Coat of Arms.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 18:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Prepaidvisa.jpg)

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Prepaidvisa.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 18:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Japanpass.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Japanpass.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:NZpass.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NZpass.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image of Canadian PR Card

Hi. You uploaded the image of a Canada Permanent Resident Card to WP [1]. I suspect this must be your PR card or you would have had to seek permission from the person who's card it is to uploaded it. Anyway, are you sure you want to display the card image with the full name, date of birth and signature clearly visible? May I recommend uploading a new image with personal details blanked out, as is common for such documents uploaded to WP.

[edit] re U-Pass etc

Hi Cahk. U-Pass and Universal Transit Pass seem to be separate articles. Could you explain the problem to me a little bit more? Herostratus 07:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Autoblock of 24.64.223.203 lifted.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  06:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Honorific prefixes

Hi, I noticed that you've been adding prefixes to some biographic articles (i.e. Michaelle Jean, Iona Campagnolo. The Manual of Style states that such titles should not be mentioned in the text inline, but can be discussed elsewhere. I don't particularly agree, but I don't think it's going to change anytime. I just thought I might let you know.

--Ibagli (Talk) 22:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:BbsHK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BbsHK.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kavadi carrier 14:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gordon Campbell

Hello. I removed that by accident. Sorry about that. -- No Guru 23:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:SOM.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SOM.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 01:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:BbsHK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BbsHK.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 07:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Nevermind... Seems I was wrong :) Happy editing! -- lucasbfr talk 07:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BC Government House

Very Sorry. I wasn't familiar with the styles of a Canadian lieutenant-governor, and I thought that "Her Honour The Honourable" came from a copy-and-paste mistake or a needless duplicity for a member of the Canadian Privy Council. Thanks for catching the mistake. -- Thesocialistesq/M.Lesocialiste 00:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Biometric HKSAR passport

please upload new image of biometric HKSAR passport. The older image of Hong Kong SAR passport is no longer up-to-date. Thanks for your attention. 72.138.191.63 15:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Passport

Hey,

Yeah, I do realize that passports are always the property of Her Majesty, but by that same token the photo should be able to be posted under Crown Copyright, as it is held in Right of Her Majesty. This differs from many of the other federal content/photographs, which are held by the Government of Canada and therefore have different reproduction rights.

Anyway, not that it matters. I just felt an example should be posted. Snickerdo 05:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Sam Sullivan

Sorry about that then. I had no idea. And I don't think I am able to press any "religious beliefs" onto my edits, since I don't even have a religion to start with. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 19:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Monarchy in Canada

It seems to me that instead of saying "the Governor General and Lieutenant Governors", it's more succinct to say "the Governors General and Lieutenant." Why repeat the word Governor twice? --G2bambino 19:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I understand that the official title is "Lieutenant Governor of ...." However, all eleven vice-regals are governors (ie. they govern), of which there are two types: general and lieutenant (one that governs generally and ten lieutenants to govern below him/her). Hence: the Governors General and Lieutenant. In fact, now that I think about it, the words should probably not be capitalized, and the instead should read "the governors general and lieutenant." --G2bambino 19:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I apologize, but, while saying "Most of the Queen's domestic duties are performed by the Governor General and Lieutenant Governors" is accurate, I fail to see how the sentence "Most of the Queen's domestic duties are performed by the governors, both general and lieutenant" is either incorrect, or even confusing. It is aready explained in length that the Monarch is represented by a Governor General at the federal level and Lieutenant Govenrors at the provincial level. As well, the article is already long enough. But, if you feel so stongly that it needs to be repeated yet another time, and it seems you do as you've already changed it, then so be it. However, there really is no need to explain again that the Commissioners are not vice-regals. --G2bambino 19:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't want to nit-pick on this too much, but I think you're a little confused about the role of the Canadian governors and their titles. The governors in Canada are called governors because, well, they govern. One is a governor general because he/she governs the country over all, ie. generally. As the Constitution Act states, the Governor General is the "Chief Executive Officer... carrying on the Government of Canada on behalf and in the Name of the Queen." The provincial governors are subordinate to the federal governor, and thus are called his/her lieutenants. Neither has anything to do with military ranks. The nature of the offices inspires their titles, not the other way around.
The Canadian governor general did indeed exercise executive power after 1867, as did the lieutenant governors. That usage of the reserve and constitutional powers has diminished, but the powers remain, meaning the governors continue to govern, making them not simply ceremonial bodies.
As per the GG being Commander-in-Chief: the Constitution also states that it is the Queen who has command in chief over the Canadian Armed Forces. The Governor General, through the 1901 Militia Act, performs the functions of this position as the Sovereign's representative. Thus, the office of Commander-in-Chief is shared between the Queen and her vice-regal, and is accorded to them through law, not merely as a ceremonial function. Of course, due to the principals of constitutional monarchy, neither person will exercise their powers as C-in-C without the advice of their ministers, but the principal remains the same.
I apologize if this is long-winded, but Canada's constitution is a rather convoluted thing. --G2bambino 20:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

The Lieutenant Governors are appointed by the Governor General, not the Sovereign (as Australian state Governors are). They cannot defer any reserved provincial bills to the Monarch, but only to the GG, who may then defer them to the Queen. Ergo, though they are the representatives of the Queen in Right of their respective province, they remain subordinate to the Governor General. Granted, this relationship between the vice-regals is ever-evolving.
Further, the 1947 Letters Patent allowed the Governor General to exercise the powers of the sovereign, but explicitly do not "transfer" the powers to the GG. They say "We do hereby authorize and empower Our Governor General... to exercise all powers and authorities lawfully belonging to Us in respect of Canada." The powers... lawfully belonging to us part is what's important here. Therefore, the Sovereign remains C-in-C by the Constitution, while the GG has been allowed to fulfill the functions of said office, and hold the title, by both the Letters Patent and the Milita Act.
I'm interested, though, in where you see that the Queen can no longer declare war. The link to the Emergencies Act 1985 that you provided did not give me the Act, and a read through it here revealed nothing that revokes her power to do so. It seems to merely deal with the Governor General (note, referred to as the "Governor in Council", not "Governor General in Council") and how he/she declares a "war emergency," which, it seems, wouldn't arise unless war itself had been declared. --G2bambino 23:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

That's interesting information, thanks. I won't debate you on the issue of who is authorised to declare war (though, unless I'm really missing something, I see a "war emergency" as different to war itself), but I still maintain that the 1947 letters patent did not strip the Sovereign of any powers - nothing in them says that any part of the Constitution Act is repealed, and explicitly state that the powers belonging to the Sovereign continue to belong to them. Thus, that, plus the fact that members of the Armed Forces continue to swear allegiance to the Queen, and not the GG, and that the Queen is still vested with all executive authority in and over Canada, would mean that she continues to be C-in-C of the forces, despite having the GG act, and be titled, as such in her place. --G2bambino 15:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sam Sullivan

"His worship" is an honorific prefix, not a title, and should not be used in the caption. The title that comes with the Mayor's Office is "Mayor," as in "Mayor Sam Sullivan. The source you provided clearly states that "His Worship" is a "style of address"; the honorific article states that "English honorifics are usually limited to formal situations" and notes that they are only incorrectly mistaken with titles; the Your worship article states that it is used "in spoken address"; and the Style (manner of address) article specifies that it is an "oral address." According to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, honorifics "should not be included in the text inline but may be legitimately discussed in the article proper," and since your addition, it is discussed in the article. Other relevant conventions on Wikipedia are to use the most commonly associated name for the subject, and to accept a person's self-identification. The context of those are arguably somewhat different (i.e., article titles and personal identity), but they do embody a principle; I've met Sullivan and follow Vancouver city politics, and can't imagine him ever insisting, or even asking, to be referred to as something so hoity-toity. The city's website does not use "His worship," but rather Mayor Sam Sullivan, as does his official website. As for other articles that use honorific prefixes, many, if not most, don't. In any case, how other articles do something is not conclusive evidence that it is correct, but as far as that goes, the relevant comparison is not elected officials at other levels of government, but other Mayors of major Canadian cities, none of which use "His Worship." Bobanny 04:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Card-front.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Card-front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Swisstemppassport.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Swisstemppassport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Campassport.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Campassport.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Spartaz 14:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Card-front2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Card-front2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Spartaz 14:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Card-back.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Card-back.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Spartaz 14:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:250px-Colonialhongkongarms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:250px-Colonialhongkongarms.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 04:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:180px-Jesse_Spencer_house2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:180px-Jesse_Spencer_house2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/a/h/User_talk%7ECahk_fc66.html"