User talk:C56C
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Removal skepticism
Why did you remove?[1] Your edit summary was "removed content, as this should be added to Miracles of Lourdes or Our Lady of Lourdes," those "articles" are redirects. There is no need to remove that material when discussing the Sanctuary of Lourdes. C56C 06:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- The reason why I deleted this, is because the article Lourdes is about the town - sceptism should be kept to "Miracles of Lourdes" - as its an article on the sceptism of the miracles. How can you be a sceptic of a town? Matt - London 14:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- You can be skeptical about something the town is famous for. C56C 19:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Attorneygate
Excellent catch. I added a link to a Time Magazine article that references it. Eleemosynary 22:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sentinel HC
Page created at 05:08 and you marked for deletion at 05:09. Fairly quick, a little hard to expand an article within a minute. C56C 05:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey C56C, no one has ever accused me of sitting on my hands when work is to be done. As you probably already know the deletion, tag is already lifted. In addition, which may help to prevent quick deletions (of hard-work), a note that the article is being expanded or doing a detailed outline in the sandbox prevents these quick-handed deletions. However, most importantly welcome to Wikipedia. Shoessss 11:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Heather Wilson
Please do not add false accusations of vandalism to my user talk page. You are involved in a garden variety content dispute with me. It is not vandalism. You are posting partisan political theater from DailyKos.com and I have reverted it. The story you've linked in the Albuquerque Journal was commenting on the political chicanery by DailyKos.com and clearly indicated that this was a dead story. It was about a child molesting accusation from 14 years ago. No charges were filed, no arrests were made, and county prosecutor Schwartz admitted that when Wilson moved the file, no laws were broken. The alleged "victim" is now 30 years old, and didn't want to press charges in the first place.
I am beginning to suspect that you're a paid political operative from the Patricia Madrid campaign. I've reverted your political chicanery again. It has no place in an encyclopedia, except under the heading, "Dirty Tricks by DailyKos.com." Kzq9599 23:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh please. C56C 23:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm curious as to why you picked me to assist in this matter? I saw Arbustoo was present and decided not to intervene; but I did look at the situation and couldn't immediately discern if anyone was acting in bad faith. Both with my unfamiliarity of the subject and with Living Persons policy. I have less Wikitime these days than I'd prefer, so my effectiveness in disputes isn't what it use to be. - RoyBoy 800 02:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
