User talk:Bx228

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, Bx228, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 14:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Manastir Mileseva.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Manastir Mileseva.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] well...

I said there,the man who made it,made it with purpose to make a image for public free use...So please abort scheduled deletion...Please,i am writing this 5 hours already,with pauses...please,don't be so cruel...

Well, now that you put the liscence back on, it should be fine. GeorgeMoney (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Yep, it's OK now. GeorgeMoney (talk) 23:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prijepolje

It says that it's written in poor English (which it is). I don't see how that's unclear. There's nothing wrong with it, it just needs to be cleaned. --Wafulz 18:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Just read through it yourself:

During very long otoman period it have been raised a many objects. Most famous are Ibrahim Pasha's mosque and Sahat Kula.Ibrahim Pasha's mosque in Shararampov (one of tree regions in town,other two are Vakuf and Center of town), probably was built in XVI century.That is very beautiful and atractive mosque with one minaret, and it was covered by cheramida(special cover of the houses in that tme). Prijepolje's region is known as very rough past which was part of of First serbian revolt, Banine's revolt 1875, Javorian war 1876, Raonic revolt, balcan wars and both of world wars.

This almost reads like a machine translation. The grammar and syntax are very awkward and unclear, and a lot of the information is lost in the confusion/unintentional humour of the mistakes. --Wafulz 18:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Ditto. Er, why did you ask me? Only edit I made to that article was to suggest that the coat of arms be merged. --Phoenix Hacker 00:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prijepolje 2

Ма нема проблема, сређивање је још у току... Ако имаш још информација о Пријепољу, слободно их убаци, а ја ћу то сређивати што се енглеског тиче. --estavisti 21:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Да ли Пријепоље има 80 мјесних заједница? На списку их има стотинак... --estavisti 21:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


Siguran ? Ja sam prepisivao iz statuta opstine Pijepolje gd es enavodi tachan broj to 82 odprilike ne moguche 100 ali proverichu,ja ima problem a sa cookiesima ksno mi se prikazuju promene pa ne mogu doro da se orjentishem...samo mi malo smeta sto si malo redukovo sadrzaj slika,ali dobro you're the boss...Bx228 00:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Da,refresh nisam uradio u editoru... :P Bx228 00:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Ok for now,i hvala josh jednom,i vidi nekako d apopunish clanak sa josh slika iz galerije,psoto mi je nekako ona zbrkana... Bx228 00:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:300px-Grb-Prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:300px-Grb-Prijepolje.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Qualixxx 00:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Vimeo.155696.767b18.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vimeo.155696.767b18.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

You removed the orphaned fair use tag from this image and added "Should be used in coca-cola advertising section". The question now becomes, are you going to add it into the appropriate page? It is great you have identified a use, you should now use it. If it remains un-used, someone (perhaps even me) will likely come and re-tag it in the coming weeks.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Coat of arms deletion

If you could provide an exact file name, that would help. --Fang Aili talk 14:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fang Aili talk 05:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Grb-Prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-Prijepolje.jpg. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:DSC00108.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC00108.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 19:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Pr923696.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pr923696.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 19:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Hisardzik.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hisardzik.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 20:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Pr923695.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pr923695.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 20:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fang Aili talk 16:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Tito 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tito 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fang Aili talk 17:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Manastir Mileseva.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Manastir Mileseva.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fang Aili talk 17:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

More images needing sources

--Fang Aili talk 17:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Are you Admir Veljovich?

Hello Bx228. Are you Admir Veljovich? If not, you must indicate an actual *source* for these images. Did you get them on a website? Over e-mail from Mr. Veljovich? Also, we need proof that he releases them to copyrighted free use. Thanks! --Fang Aili talk 15:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prijepolje

Pozdrav. Pa nedavno sam krenuo da sređujem sve članke o gradovima Srbije, pa sam stigao do Prijepolja. Mislio sam da će slike ovako bolje izgledati, ako ti imaš bolju ideju u vezi toga, slobodno to promeni. PANONIAN (talk) 10:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Pa što se tiče slike, nije estetski da u članku slike stoje jedna pored druge. Slike se obično stavljaju kao ilustracija teksta, dakle ili levo ili desno od teksta, a ne ovako jedna pored druge. Zato mislim da je to loše mesto za sliku. PANONIAN (talk) 23:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Pa koliko vidim, anonimni korisnik hoće da stavi link u članak, a ti taj link brišeš. U naslov "External links" se obično stave svi linkovi koji su vezani za grad ili opštinu. Zašto ti uklanjaš taj link iz članka? PANONIAN (talk) 23:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

"Pa zato shto taj link nema veze,sadrzinski,nikakve sa Prijepoljem,stim da bi posetioci chlanka bili jako zbunjeni,jer link nema nikakve veze sa chlankom,a josh manje Prijepoljem."

Kako bre nema veze sa Prijepoljem? Pa jesi li uopšte pogledao link: http://www.prijepolje.org/ Sa čime onda link ima veze ako ne sa Prijepoljem? Inače u infobox se stavlja zvanični sajt opštine a link koji si ti stavio nije zvanični sajt opštine. PANONIAN (talk) 13:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Vidi: ja na takav način ne želim da razgovaram: gledam u nebo i vidim da je plavo, a ti me ubeđuješ da je zeleno. Pa ko je ovde blesav? Pogledaj sajt: http://www.prijepolje.org/ sad klikni levo na rubriku istorija grada: http://www.prijepolje.org/ist.htm sad klikni na geografija grada: http://www.prijepolje.org/geo.htm Pa kome ti pričaš da to nema veze sa Prijepoljem? Jel ti misliš da ja imam 5 godina i da možeš da mi prodaješ šarene laže? Dakle, očigledno imaš neke druge (lične) razloge zašto hoćeš da ukloniš taj link, a da onaj drugi (koji nije zvanični) predstaviš kao zvanični, i ako želiš da nastaviš konstruktivan razgovor sa mnom, onda bi bilo lepo da mi kažeš prave razloge svog ponašanja u vezi ovih linkova a ne da mi daješ odgovor u koji ni dete od 5 godina ne bi poverovalo. PANONIAN (talk) 15:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok, vidi ovako: stvarno nemam vremena da se više bavim linkovima u tom članku. Praksa Vikipedije je da se u infobox stavljaju samo zvanični sajtovi opštine (a ne neki drugi) a da se u "External links" stave svi linkovi što imaju veze sa člankom (bez obzira da li je deo sadržaja u tim linkovima prekopiran odnekud). Prema tome, uredi taj članak kako želiš (ili kako ti već dozvoli anonimni korisnik koji se sa tobom ne slaže), ali te molim da od mene ne tražiš da ti pomognem u tom sporu ako ne želiš da prihvatiš moje sugestije. Toliko. PANONIAN (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/x/2/User_talk%7EBx228_85e9.html"