Talk:Buzz Hargrove

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	This article is part of WikiProject Organized Labour, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Organized Labour. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.

I don't feel well-enough informed to write all this myself, but I have a couple of suggestions about the general organization of this article. I think rather that its current order of general info, followed by a "1999 election" subsection, "federal politics" subsection, and then a separate "2006 federal election," is kind of confusing. Maybe it would be better to divide the discussion of Hargrove's politics into two broad sections: Ontario Politics and Federal Politics, and then include the subsidiary discussion of various elections as subcategories.

The Ontario Politics section could also include discussion of Hargrove and the CAW's relationship with the Bob Rae government in Ontario and his implementation of the Social Contract. That would be helpful background as to why Hargrove and the CAW adopted the "tactical voting" approach in the first place. Like I said, I am not extremely well informed about this area, but I think Hargrove discusses it in at least one of his books mentioned in the leading paragraph of the article?

What do you think?Robbie dee.

First of all, the grammar and punctuation needs some serious attention in places. Secondly, the article appears to harbour considerable bias, focussing primarily on Hargrove's negative press. It seems less like an encyclopedia entry than it does an opinion article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.180.184.128 (talk • contribs).

>> As I indicated in my earlier message, I do believe that Buzz tries to explain his actions, and his history with the NDP, in his own book. If someone who has read that book would like to add additional info which balances the "negative press" I think it would improve the article, but I have not read Hargrove's book and can only rely on the information publicly available on the net, which as you point out is predominantly negative. Your help would be appreciated, also could you sign your comments? Robbie dee 14:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Federal politics

I cut this out. "The NDP made significant gains in popular vote, although they were dissapointed to gain only 5 seats for a total of 19, well short of the predicted 40." I think an unintended meaning here is that the gain at the polls was a direct result of Hargrove's endorsment.--Bookandcoffee 19:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] references

I converted the article to the <ref> format. I commented out three links - two were broken, and one was a fairly thin reference to the "babble.ca" blog. I left {{fact}} tags as markers. I also moved the following list from the ext links section. They appeared to be "further reading", but seemed more like unused references to me... feel free to put them back if they should be there.