User talk:Bunty.Gill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
 |
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content | |
|
Newcomers: Welcome kit | Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions |
||
— Ambuj Saxena (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] IITian
Hi,
You may wish to include the following in your userpage:
 |
This user attends or attended the Indian Institute of Technology. |
To add it, just add
{{user iit}}
on your userpage. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your message
Hi! I've replied to your message on my talk page. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 20:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Username
Hi,
I notice that you have had a username change. After it has been done, please avoid maintaining the other page also. It is advised that you make the older page a redirect to the new page, so that there is no confusion or maintenance related problems. Regards, — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 12:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] re:Makki di Roti
Hey there, that link goes to Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links, which is basically a big long list of pages that have links to disambiguation pages. A disambiguation page is needed when lots of things have the same name, for example... [[Punjab]] is a disambig page, because there is Punjab in Pakistan, Punjab in India, Punjab as a British Indian province... etc. What I did on that page was change [[Punjab]] to [[Punjab region|Punjab]]. That way, the link reads "Punjab", but instead of going to the disambiguation page, actually goes to the Punjab region article.
When I write "lend a hand", it just means that there are lots of disambiguation pages where the links have piled up, and it's good to have people working on them to clear them up, and point them to the correct article. For example, if I wrote "Haryana borders UP and [[Punjab]]", it would go the page with different options on it. Instead, I would change it to "Haryana borders UP and [[Punjab (India)|Punjab]].
That's all there is to it, really! :) Does that make things clearer? If not, drop me a line again. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 17:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- No worries! I was just reading your userpage, do you have a biology background? That's what I'm aiming for as well. Still a few years to go til then, though :) Do you contribute to the science articles here at all? — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 18:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Cool. Well, cheers, have a good day! — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 18:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deleting comments
Your deletion of Carnildo's comments was absolutely inappropriate. If you do that again, you may be blocked. Please review WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 21:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- The issue is what makes his/her writings that pretend to be conclusive, more valuable than the entire discussion? No mala fide intent. Apologies. Bunty.Gill 21:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm well, thanks... yikes, I see you're in a spot of trouble? Careful there! :) Anyway, if you like, you can email me; I'd prefer to reserve my talk page for WP-related discussion. Cheers, — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 01:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WP:MED
Hi,
the main page of WikiProject Medicine has just been redesigned, comments are welcome! Please consider listing yourself as a participant.
--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 00:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Help Needed
Since you were active on the Chandigarh page- slight dispute over notability of Capt Navdeep Singh, and if he 1. Warrants an article in the first place, and 2. Deserves to be in the Famous Chandigarhian's list as his fan/s seem to insist. Haphar 16:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
