Talk:Bulma
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Tables
If you're trying to standardize the tables, we should add a 'Manga Name' to each instance of the table (because it's sometimes neither the most popular name, nor the anime name) and maybe we can collapse the 'Alternate Names' into a single field with less explanation. It gets trickier for characters like Master Roshi where you have multiple names in English and Romaji. Hard to squeeze in a common format and still have any the info. JRP 21:44, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Fields
I took your advice and added the Alternate Name, and Manga Name field to Template:DB Character. Breaks can be added where multiple Romaji and English names exist. Things look better for this one.BCKILLa 06:25, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Poor quality
There are several points in this page where the article is poorly edited. I suggest it be tagged for cleanup.
[edit] Stop deleteing that vegeta part
Read this http://www.nfsupreme.com/hostees/dranet/mangas/photo.php?file=/Dragon%20Ball%20%26%20DBZ%20Manga/volume42/Db42ch07/420705.gif and look at one of the words —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Synthe (talk • contribs) .
- That is the translated version, how about the original one to see if he is referring to her as wife? -- ReyBrujo 00:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ummm...
Not to be sick minded or anything, but there is a strange bit of trivia about Bulma that could be put in. She is the only character in the original Manga to be shown topless. I'm not going to add it, but you can discuss whether it is worth being put in or not. (again, I have no idea if this kind of trivia is even allowed, but it is up to you guys) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Buster Sword (talk • contribs) .
-
- I think it is allowed, wikipedia is not censored.Muchi 23:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- What episode was that?Voicingmaster 19:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- The dubs have cut it out mostly, but the three main instances in Dragon Ball are:
- Episode 5 or 6. Yamcha pulls the blanket off Bulma while she sleeps. Areolae can be seen around the obscuring stars in the anime only.
- Episode 9. Technically Oolong polymorphed into Bulma, showing his/her breasts to Roshi. I haven't seen this episode uncut, but you could make out the nipples in the manga.
- Episode 70 or 71. Krillian pulls down Bulma's top to give Roshi a nose bleed, in both the anime and manga. –Gunslinger47 20:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- The dubs have cut it out mostly, but the three main instances in Dragon Ball are:
- What episode was that?Voicingmaster 19:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I think it is allowed, wikipedia is not censored.Muchi 23:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A curious statement
"However, after the Freeza Saga she begins a relationship with Vegeta after several blowjobs and a heated argument which led to three hour intercourse ..."
Now, I may be going out on a limb here...but it seems to me that even if the bolded portion of this statement were true and verifiable (and believe me, I do have my doubts), it adds absolutely nothing to the article and should be removed. -- 65.100.120.83 11:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Android controller
Bulma's remote control that was built to disable Androids #17 and #18 might not've been significant on it's own (due to never actually being used in the primary timeline), but it may've been used in an alternate timeline. It also played a significant role in the sequence of events leading up to Android #18's absorption by Cell, yet it is not mentioned in the article anywhere.
Just a nitpick. --- Randilyn
[edit] Bulma and Vegeta section?
I have recently spoken to several fans of the Dragonball Wikipedia articles that request we add a Vegeta and Bulma section to at least one article. I was the one who deleted it from the Vegeta article. I don't think we need this, it's not overly important, but I thought that if we do decide to have one, it'd be better to have it here then on the Vegeta one. Thoughts? --Majinvegeta 14:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- It was full of speculation and original research then, and it'll end up the same now. It isn't needed--$UIT 02:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)