Talk:Buick Century
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of Automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
|
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
The 2003 picture, I'm afraid, is a LeSabre, not a Century. Compare to the vehicle in the 2003 Century review in the External Links section. It's admittedly not much of a tribute to Buick styling of late years that such a mistake can be made. RivGuySC 03:31, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Dang, you got me! Yum, crow... --SFoskett 13:23, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
Is it possible to provide engine options for the '30s, '50s, & '70s Cents? Trekphiler 03:29, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 1936 Century
The latest edit has added some very good information on the first Century. However, I think the article is now overbalanced to that one year, at the expense of the rest of the models. Also, are we sure that Mr. Breeze would be OK with his writing being used here? (The edit was by an IP address.) Some pruning, at least, is probably in order. RivGuySC 03:01, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Was this published elsewhere? If so, it more than likely is copyrighted material, and should be removed. Owen× ☎ 03:40, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
I'm inclined to delete the cost of the fender-mount spares as unnecessary. Comment? Also, are there no public domain photos? No rodder or customizer with a '36 Cent that can upload a good one? Trekphiler 03:05, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Updates, 1936-1958
I have attempted to update the 1936-1942 and 1954-1958 Century narratives. In doing so I have removed a great deal information regarding wood framing, doors, spare tire options, etc. I also reworked the intro paragraph. I'd like to see this article streamlined and sourced, and I think these changes are agood first step. Stude62 14:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
