Talk:Bugs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Bugs Bunny
I think the most common use of Bugs is with Bugs Bunny. When people say "Bugs," they mostly refer to Bugs Bunny. -- SNIyer12(talk) 04:20, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree. Further, Bugs Bunny is already an article at a diffferent; using primary topic disambiguation for a redirect is not what we do. "Bugs" is definitely two actual things, so there's scope for full-on disambiguation, though the programme is rather more famous than a cute technical term to describe a part of broadcasts, so personally I would, err, keep the page as it was for over a year.
- James F. (talk) 14:30, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- When most people say "bugs", they are referring to the plural of bug (disambiguation). Also, remember that Wikipedia is not to be American-centric. There is a disambiguation page for Bugs, and that is where this needs to point. By the way, you've actually broken the three revert rule. I'm having another editor (because I've made 3 reverts and cannot make a fourth) change this to the appropriate status, do NOT change it back.--FuriousFreddy 23:10, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- It is clear by looking at what current points to bugs:
- The following pages link to here (up to 500 are shown):
- Battlefield 1942
- Battlefield Pirates
- Change Control
- User talk:Sp82
- User:Angmering/Oldpage
- End of civilization
- Captive NTFS
- User talk:FuriousFreddy
- Torvalds's law
- Software rot
- User talk:Spotteddogsdotorg
That bugs bunny is not the obvious intention of links to bugs. In fact, there were 5 links meaning Computer Bug and one meaning Bugs (Television Series). All fixed (why haven't you guys fixed these earlier?). Bugs will come under my monitoring. Redirecting to bugs (disambiguation). Josh Parris ✉ 01:21, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
