User talk:Btarski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] your message
To me was truncated. However I can perhaps partially reply: my bot is not generally tagging articles it is mainly dating existing tags to help with the cleanup effort. If that doesn't answer your partly asked question, please drop the rest of the question off at may talk page. Rich Farmbrough, 11:00 20 December 2006 (GMT).
- Which article? Rich Farmbrough, 20:01 20 December 2006 (GMT).
- Hi, looks basically OK to me, Skysmith (talk • contribs) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nomina_Anatomica&diff=95291811&oldid=93218468 added the tag {{attention}}, SmackBot merely dated it, and replaced it with a synonym. Rgds, Rich Farmbrough, 20:17 20 December 2006 (GMT).
[edit] Nomina Anatomica
The term "cleanup" may be more than confusing...:-7 The content of the article is fine - it just needed wikifying (adding wikilinks to other articles like User:Rich Farmbrough did) and still needs a good category. If you think some subjects in the article would justify their own article (organizations, for example), those would be a good candidates for a wikilink. Otherwise fine. Welcome to Wikipedia - Skysmith 06:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Very good points. An average acronym always has more than one meaning and wikipedia editors disambiguate various links to proper pages all the time. Others sometimes make redirects to most obvious (to them) articles too hastily.
- You could turn the FCAT redirect page (click the small link below the title of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test) into a disambiguation page (something like this):
"Acronym FCAT can refer to
- Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology, former name of FICAT, the Federative International Committee on Anatomical Terminology
- Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test
(possibly others, in alphabetical order)
{{disambig}}"
- You could do the same thing with JNA.
- Category could be anatomy or anatomical terminology. Category should be the most exlusive you can find or think of, to avoid clutter.
- Note that Wikipedia has many articles about nominally obscure topics but that does not make them any less important. Creating red links is meant to encourage editors to write articles about those subjects (I have my own list of missing topics linked from my userpage, for example). If you know any experts, anatomists or physicians you know were instrumental in forming the Nomina Anatomica, you might write about them. - Skysmith 20:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Audio files on Wikipedia
Without people like you, I doubt we'd have as much history as we now do.
I can see how it can be archived on Wikipedia, but I believe the most appropriate place for you is the Internet Archive. Their goal is similar to Wikipedia's - universal access to all human knowledge - except their methodology is a giant media archive and library, instead of a condensed encyclopedia. If you look in their audio section, there is a perfect, specific audio poetry subsection.
Create an account there ("getting a library card"), and follow their directions to contribute.
-- Znode (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Berryman
Hi,
I read that you have some John Berryman recordings on CD, are you interested in selling a copy of these? If so would you be able to contact at ben.r.parker@gmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.71.208.58 (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC).
