User talk:Bryan Seecrets

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Bryan Seecrets Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Stilgar135 18:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

[edit] Banned films#Malaysia

Bryan, I'm curious about your edits to Banned films#Malaysia. The factual content looks good (although I admit I haven't checked it for accuracy); however, you also added a couple of paragraphs of explanatory text that seem very point-of-view and biased in favor of Malaysian censorship. Was this your intent? I suspect that English is not your first language, so I want to find out what you were trying to say, before I try to recast those paragraphs into a less inflammatory tone. :) Thanks. (Reply on my talk page or Talk:Banned films#Malaysia section, please.) --Quuxplusone 23:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis

Yikes! Bryan, please don't copy text from http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Biographies+and+Profiles/Biographies/Jacqueline+Bouvier+Kennedy+First+Lady+1961-1963.htm and put it on Wikipedia, if you didn't write it. That's copyright infringement, and it's a very bad thing, legally speaking, which Wikipedia needs to avoid at all costs. --Quuxplusone 23:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Misinformation re: Star Trek: The Section 31 Files

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Star Trek (Fan made productions). Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kirok of L'Stok 11:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

But, Star Trek: The Section 31 Files is currently on hiatus after 3.05, possibly in favor of his original sci-fi tale, Far Horizons. --Bryan Seecrets 14:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Prove it. Wikipedia is about verifiable facts, NOT opinions, wishes or ScuttleButt. If you can give a reference for your statement I will be happy to allow it to stand but you and I both know that you have been told that the only way that S31 will be put into hiatus is if you continue your campaign of misinformation. The same goes for ST Pioneers as well - get your facts straight before you post.--Kirok of L'Stok 22:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Star Trek fan productions, you will be blocked. --Kirok of L'Stok 22:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Star Trek fan productions, you will be blocked. Kirok of L'Stok 09:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I know, I know, I just leave this alone. S31 is currently on hiatus, you haven't aware of it yet?!
Being in hiatus means that there is no work being done on the production and there is none planned for an extended length of time. Whilst it is true that there has been no episode for two months as against their usual one a month, you have to take into account that they released *two* episodes in December and, like most people, they took some time off over Christmas ... plus Eric is recovering from a serious car accident - weren't you aware of that? I happen to know that Mak has passed the files to Eric yesterday for post production. You have to be able to verify what you post and after your previous record I am not willing to accept ANY unverified material from you. You MUST give a link to something that verifies your posting, I can't stress that strongly enough. This is not a forum that deals in rumour and conjecture, it is an encyclopedia that deals in FACTS.
If you post inflammatory, unverified material one more time you WILL be blocked and the responsibility for this action will lie solely with you. YOU will have caused this to happen to yourself. I urge you NOT to do it.--Kirok of L'Stok 22:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I didn't post inflammatory and unverified material as of now. --Bryan Seecrets 19:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
I've recently heard S31 has ended in a cliffhanger, isn't it true? --Bryan Seecrets 03:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Bryan, you're having me on, aren't you? They've just posted a new episode THIS WEEK! Surely to goodness you aren't going to start so soon with your "are they ended?" posts as soon as they have published an episode? At least you have had the decency to post it on your User page instead of the Star Trek: Fan Productions article.--Kirok of L'Stok 08:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recreation - Laura Yonker

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Laura Yonker which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. RichMac (Talk) 00:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Then how am I going to get an approval from the administrators before doing so --Bryan Seecrets 14:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/r/y/User_talk%7EBryan_Seecrets_1cc0.html"