Talk:Bruce McMahan/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Bruce McMahan/Comments This page does not meet the criteria or sensitivity requirements for bios of living persons, nor the guidelines for What Wikipedia is. But I have been told that I misunderstand those guidelines so I am trying to up my knowledge here after seeing your posted warning tag today regarding the problems with the entry content and link to this page. The subject by its very nature (tabloids, wealth and sex) has provoked intense interest amongst editors, and I believe good faith attempts by some to improve a very questionable stub to start with, but instead we now have something that truly does read like a tabloid magazine (the vibrator entry for instance, does that prove something?) Does that make it something worthy of being posted on a respected site such as Wikipedia? I contended that the original author appeared very much to have a vendetta regarding this matter and said he was contacted by a law firm, and I still contend that this entry is What Wikipedia is not. Type FiveType Five 16:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)