User talk:BrownHornet21
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
Hi and welcome to wikipedia. I hope you like it and decide to stay. Here are some handy links for newcomers.
- Welcome
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Help pages
- Village pump
- Help desk
- Wiquette
- Wikipedia:Merge
Also you can sign your name on talk pages and vote pages with three tildes like this ~~~, and your name with a time stamp with four like this ~~~~. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. Father Howabout1 Talk to me! 03:59, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Amber Benson mediation
James Kerwin has contacted Wikimedia via OTRS to confirm that he and Amber Benson were romantically involved, the relationship changed amicably, and if you are in need of this communiqué please contact me. - Amgine 17:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, not sure it's needed for the mediation right now. You may want to make a note of it on the Amber Benson talk page. BrownHornet21 02:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- There have been some developments in the mediation case; you might want to check the page when you get a chance. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 22:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, I have decided to suspend mediation to see how the RFCU shakes out. BrownHornet21 00:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- It's a funny coincidence that Kerwin would contact the foundation just now, when his possible relationship with Amber Benson is the subject of mediation. It is an even funnier coincidence that the main editor on James Kerwin is a group of anonymous IPs from the same range as are involved in this mediation. I am beginning the think the whole story should be summed up and posted to WP:ANI. Thatcher131 00:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- It does kind of have that look, doesn't it? Apologies for dragging y'all into this. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 02:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- No apology necessary - I volunteered for this mediation. "Oh, this one looks easy . . . ." BrownHornet21 02:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- It does kind of have that look, doesn't it? Apologies for dragging y'all into this. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 02:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's a funny coincidence that Kerwin would contact the foundation just now, when his possible relationship with Amber Benson is the subject of mediation. It is an even funnier coincidence that the main editor on James Kerwin is a group of anonymous IPs from the same range as are involved in this mediation. I am beginning the think the whole story should be summed up and posted to WP:ANI. Thatcher131 00:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I agree. Amgine, is there any way to verify this "contact" via OTRS? It sounds bogus. What email address did it come from? Is there a way of contacting the individual via an official website, agent, publicist, etc. to verify? 172.190.11.119 11:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Also, the anonymous IPs in question all appear to be San Francisco area PacBell addresses. Am I correct? Could this help narrow down who is doing this? 172.190.11.119 11:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Amgine, is there any way to verify this "contact" via OTRS? It sounds bogus. What email address did it come from? Is there a way of contacting the individual via an official website, agent, publicist, etc. to verify? 172.190.11.119 11:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- (Note, I'm mainly replying here because I don't know where else this AOL user will see my comments.) I want to stress that I believe that any identifying information in the e-mail (such as the IP address from which it was sent) should be treated within the same privacy guidelines as checkuser info and should only be disclosed by the arbitration committee. Even if Cuthbert is James Kerwin, he can still edit as long as he is not disruptive. Should Cuthbert continue to be disruptive (and I note here there was an ANI report on an IP in this range acting up on Rick Berman and Amber Benson before the Cuthbert account became active) I would recommend either asking for a community ban on WP:ANI (based on behavior and the circumstantial evidence) or filing an RFAR (at which point the Arbcom will have the technical means to check accounts against the OTRS e-mail). Most of the IPs involved are Pacbell and the reverse DNS puts them in the Los Angeles area, except for 71.158.149.97, which is a different ISP and I suspect is Cuthbert's work address, since it seems to be static and was apparently autoblocked when Morwen blocked Cuthbert. There are only about 20 million people in the LA area, though, so this doesn't narrow it down much. Thatcher131 16:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- What I was asking is, is there a way to contact the individual directly via an agent or publicist, etc and verify whether he sent this supposed email to Amgine? It doesn't strike me as something someone would do. 172.192.152.14 21:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- See here for an explanation of the system. You would have to ask Amgine directly as to what he confidence level was that this was accurate. Thatcher131 22:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] John Cena mediation
I just left a comment on the page that is important to the situation. --- Lid 02:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tumen, Jilin mediation
Hi BH, sorry if this sounds a little bit impatient, but is there a way we could reach a resolution on the Tumen issue soon? To me, keeping the refugee information seems pretty straight-forward, and it'd be nice to move on to other things. Anyway, thanks for mediating this case, it's been very helpful to have a third-party voice. CES 11:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, I've inserted a mediator's proposal on the page, and I'll leave Krnc a note about it. BrownHornet21 14:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Zhukov mediation
Thanks, I will definitely participate. Sigitas 09:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Adam curry 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adam curry 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- My bad! Fixed! BrownHornet21 02:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Research Survey Request
Hello, I am a member of a research group at Palo Alto Research Center (formerly known as Xerox PARC) studying how conflicts occur and resolve on Wikipedia. Due to your experience in conflict resolution on Wikipedia (e.g., as a member of the Mediation Cabal) we’re extremely interested in your insights on this topic. We have a survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=400792384029 which we are inviting a few selected Wikipedians to participate in, and we would be extremely appreciative if you would take the time to complete it. As a token of our gratitude, we would like to present you with a PARC research star upon completion. Thank you for your time.
Parc wiki researcher 23:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
PARC User Interface Research Group
Cool! I just completed the survey. Interesting stuff, keep me posted! BrownHornet21 00:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] TfD notice
A userbox you created, Template:User notjimbowales is currently up for deletion. Please participate in the discussion here. --Zoz (t) 00:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Dallas
Attatched automatically using WP:AWB. drumguy8800 C T 04:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Munich
Would you like to join WikiProject Munich? You can sign up here here. Kingjeff 18:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] MedCabal
Hi, we have a heavy backload of cases at WP:MEDCAB and since you are on the mediator list I thought I would request your help. Thanks! --Ideogram 10:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Could you help with some research?
Hello BrownHornet21,
I'm currently in the middle of a PhD at the University of Bath, UK. I'm examining the way that mediation differs between face-to-face, video-conferenced and text-based meetings. You can get a gist of the research from my (somewhat sparse) homepage here.
I've been trawling through the MediationCabal archives and noticed that you've mediated in number of cases. Would you be willing to spare some time to talk to me about your experiences mediating? It'd help me out no end!
If you'd like some more info, you can leave a message on my talkpage or contact me via the e-mail on my homepage.
Many thanks
Matt
MattB2 14:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Fort Worth
Hi, BrownHornet21! I have proposed a WikiProject for Fort Worth, and I was just wondering if you were interested. Please show your support by going here and adding your name to the list of interested Wikipedians. To improve the quality of this and other Fort Worth-related articles, I believe it necessary now for this project to exist. Dallas, Texas, although not yet a featured article, is of signficantly higher quality than Fort Worth's article is. We need a few more interested members before the project goes into action. Thanks! --Stallions2010 19:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Hello BrownHornet21
Thanks for agreeing to help me with my research.
What I would like to do, would be to ask you a few open-ended questions about your experiences of mediating in a text-based environment, and then chase up any further questions raised by your answers. You can write as much or as little as you want for each answer.
I'd also ask that you'd give your consent for me to report and/or quote part of your answers in my thesis and any subseqent publications. Obviously I will make the information as anonymous as possible (blanking out names and other identifiable references).
If you're still willing to take part, let me know and i'll provide you with the first raft of questions.
Thanks again,
Matt
MattB2 15:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Works for me! BrownHornet21 04:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A couple of questions for you!
Ok BrownHornet21 - here's the questions. . .
What I would like to do is ask a few background questions, a few open-ended questions, and then, based on your answers to these, i'd like to ask a few more detailed ones.
Background
- 1) How long have you been mediating for Wikipedia?
- 2) Were you given any specific training to be a mediator for Wikipedia?
- 3) Do you have any other experience of mediation/dispute resolution (if so, what is it and for how long)?
General
- 1) What factors do you find makes a dispute particularly difficult to mediate?
- 2) What makes a good mediator - e.g skills, attitude?
- 3) What difficulties are posed by mediating through technology?
- 4) In what way does technology help you mediate?
Answer as much or as little as you want to. If you could post the answers on my talkpage User:MattB2, or e-mail them to me via the address on my homepage [1], that would be great. However, i'm happy for you to post them here if you'd prefer. Any comments/questions, let me know.
Many thanks
Matt
MattB2 12:20, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Some follow-up questions, if I may . . .
Hello BrownHornet21,
Thanks for taking the time to help with my research. I've a few more questions i'd like to ask you, mainly concering the differences between 'real-world' and wiki mediaiton.
Differences/similarities between the environments
- 1) Are there any particular techniques or approaches that you find work well in both real life and wikipedia? If so, why do you think this is?
- 2) Conversely, are there techniques/approaches that you are more comfortable using in one of the environments than the other? and again, why do you think this is?
- 3) You mention that a weak mediator might 'doom the process'. IRL, how does a mediator come across as 'strong' (or at least 'not weak') and how might this be limited/enabled by the Wikipedia environment?
Thanks again.
Matt
MattB2 13:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
(I know it's not quite as prestigious as a PARC Barnstar - but the principle is the same!)
Thanks for all your help BrownHornet21. It's been very informative. I should have enough to go with for the time being, and I'll let you know if anything comes out of the research.
All the best.
Matt MattB2 08:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Adam_curry_1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_curry_1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yonatan (contribs/talk) 16:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD
Hi BrownHornet21, this is a message I'm posting to everyone who participated in this AfD. I have nominated the same article for deletion again here – you might be interested. Regards, KissL 09:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)