Talk:Brodie Foster Hubbard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] WP:MUSIC
Per Wikipedia guidelines:
- Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media
- Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city
- Has won or placed in a major music competition
- Is cited in notable and verifiable sources as being influential in style/technique in a particular music genre
- Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture
Notability has been asserted with multiple sources, all cited within the article. PT (s-s-s-s) 19:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] comment by annon
It's not vandalism if it's a valid question. Vanity pages are against Wikipedia rules, and this is a grossly apparent violation of that rule - to say nothing of the lack of relevance this guy has to the Phoenix music scene, no matter how he may delude himself by maintaining his own Wikipedia page.
Spend the ten bucks for a domain and cheap hosting, and quit soiling a valuable public resource with this crap. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 149.169.224.230 (talk • contribs).
- OK, you've had you're say. However, I don't know of any evidence to support you're theory and your attacks are treading close to violating Wikipedia's policy for articles on living persons. (see WP:BLP) -MrFizyx 03:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- I have also been accused of being... Ryan Avery, Andrew Jackson Jihad, JRC, and Dain Q. Gore. I wrote articles about Arizona music, they are backed by reliable sources, all cited and asserting notability in the articles. These are not vanity pages. Parsssseltongue 00:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)