User talk:Brideshead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Age of consent
2 Signing comments
3 Federal Prisons
4 Bonjour!
5 Foster Care
6 Your edit to Special education
7 WP:SCOWNB Participants merger with WP:SCO
8 Emerald article

[edit] Age of consent

Hi, thanks for your edit! The information and link you added in support is exactly the kind of thing this article needs. I did clean up your edit a wee bit.. (can't help myself lol) what exactly would bisexual sex consist of? (don't answer that lol) --Cheers! Monotonehell 18:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Signing comments

Please remember to sign the comments you leave on Talk pages. All you need to do is type four tildes (~~~~) after your comment and Wikipedia will automatically fill in your username and a timestamp. Thanks. AlistairMcMillan 03:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

You ALWAYS sign comments? Would you care to place a small wager on that? [1] AlistairMcMillan 13:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Federal Prisons

Isn't the national government of the United Kingdom compared to the government of Scotland analogous to the federal government of the United States vs. the governments of the individual states? I would suggest that you do, then, live in a country with a federal government, of sorts. Denvoran 22:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bonjour!

I just wanted to drop in and say bonjour! Jim Bart 21:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC) (I'm introducing myself around WP.)

[edit] Foster Care

The Rfc is a good plan...thanks. Let's see what develops and that should resolve the matter with some consensus. DPeterson^talk 20:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Special education

I reverted the introduction to special education. Your introduction doesn't talk about inclusion. this one does...without special education, inclusion would not be possible. I agree with the previous editor. I don't like the way you say that this "may be" emotional, physical, circumstantial or intellectual and may require special teaching approaches, equipment or care within or outwith a regular classroom or in a special school setting. Special education is for students with sinular needs or disabilities.....i still think that it's much clearer before. What is your problem?! Why do you keep reverting my edits? I am fully involved. Look at all of my edits that I've done! How can you say I'm not fully involved? My edits does not involve in America....it is completely neutral. Clearly, you are the only being bothered by it. No one has said anything about it. Can't we get an administrator to help us resolve this issue? you don't agree with me...and I don't agree with you....Special education is inclusion...that's why I merged inclusion to special education. I did discussed it on the talk page.....that I was going to merge it. Well it's not my fault that people don't like to discuss things with me. I put that up like weeks ago...and did anyone respond to me? NO. I don't have all day waiting for their responses....how do i get them to respond to me faster? (209.177.21.6 - Talk)

--www.secularism.org.uk 19:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in trying to balance the content of the special education article. I know it is especially frustrating at times, but I encourage you to tone down your remarks towards the other editor. I think completely changing the opening paragraph has had a positive effect on the discussion and hopefully the process will be easier (at least for the time being). Nposs 20:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I've posted a request for help on the Wikiproject Education page. Maybe we can pick up a few experts to help out. By the way, having your username appear as a url might be a violation of WP:USER. Not sure - but you might want to take a look at it. Nposs 04:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:SCOWNB Participants merger with WP:SCO

As I hope you may have seen I am attempting to tidy up WP:SCOWNB by removing old notices and the duplication that has emerged since the creation of WP:SCO. One of the latter issues is that there are lists of active Wikipedians on both locations which overlap to a significant degree. As WP:SCOWNB is ideally a place for announcements I am in process of merging the lists at WP:SCO and intend to remove the one at WP:SCOWNB when this is complete. However there are a fair number of Users not on both lists. If you do not wish to have you current WP:SCOWNB entry re-appear at WP:SCO please either let me know or edit the latter as appropriate. Thanks for your patience, and continuing support of matters relating to WikiProject Scotland. Ben MacDui (Talk) 18:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)